Ousted Honduran leader says won't negotiate return

Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:55pm EST
 
[-] Text [+]

TEGUCIGALPA (Reuters) - Deposed Honduran President Manuel Zelaya said on Saturday he would refuse to return to the presidency as part of any deal to end the crisis sparked by his ouster, saying that to do so would legitimize a June coup.

A U.S.-brokered agreement to end the political deadlock in the central American nation collapsed earlier this month after de facto leader Roberto Micheletti said he would form a new government without Zelaya.

"From this date onward, I reaffirm my decision not to accept any agreement to return to the presidency (that would) cover up this coup," Zelaya said, reading from a letter written to U.S. President Barack Obama.

Zelaya had initially welcomed the pact, which he said was meant to reinstate him.

South American leaders have called for his reinstatement but Washington seemed to weaken his position by saying it would recognize a November 29 presidential election simply on the basis of the signing of the accord.

Under the pact, Congress was supposed to vote on whether or not Zelaya would be restored to power, but no deadline was set and lawmakers have dragged their feet.

Zelaya sneaked back into the country in September and has been living in the Brazilian Embassy ever since.

(Reporting by Helen Popper)

 
Photo

More News

Aid freeze in post-coup Honduras hurting poor
Thursday, 12 Nov 2009 02:58pm EST 
Honduran rivals signal new bid to solve crisis
Saturday, 7 Nov 2009 11:47am EST 
Honduras pact crumbles over unity government
Friday, 6 Nov 2009 01:22pm EST 
Honduran opposition leader key to ending conflict
Sunday, 1 Nov 2009 02:16pm EST 

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?m=02&d=20091115&t=2&i=12519748&w=450&r=2009-11-15T111439Z_01_RJO111_RTRIDSP_0_AFGHANISTAN
How to finance the war in Afghanistan?

Despite all the pondering President Obama has given to whether to increase troops, it seems he has given far too little consideration to the overall cost of escalating the war and how it will undercut his ability to fund the ambitious domestic policy agenda he has set out from bank bailouts to health care reform.  Commentary