Election 2008 Candidates
Bill Richardson
Families urge Iran to release U.S. hikers
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The families of three Americans held in Iran on spy charges appealed again for their release on Sunday, saying they feared for their mental well-being after more than three months in captivity. Full Article
1 of 5
Factbox: Bill Richardson
Richardson was elected to a second term as New Mexico governor in 2006. He had been a leading Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives and, under President Bill Clinton in the 1990s, served as U.N. ambassador and as energy secretary.
During Clinton's term, he also served as a diplomatic trouble-shooter. In 1995, he negotiated with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein to secure the release of two Americans detained after straying over the border from Kuwait and he frequently acted as a go-between with Communist North Korea.
Richardson, the son of a Mexican mother and an American father, was born in Pasadena, California, on Nov. 15, 1947. He spent part of his youth in Mexico City, where his father headed Citibank and his mother, who was born in Oaxaca, were a leading society couple.
At 13 he was sent to the elite Middlesex prep school in Massachusetts. He later majored in international relations at Tufts University, also in Massachusetts, and received a masters degree from its Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
At Middlesex Richardson was a star baseball pitcher and drew the attention of Major League scouts. He conceded in 2005 that a long-standing claim that he had been drafted by a Major League Baseball team was not true -- he chose to go to college rather than play professionally and an arm injury subsequently ended any hopes he may have had for a career in the sport.
Compare the Issues
Because
of the debt that this government, under this president, has exploded,
we are now dependent upon China, and how do you get tough on your
banker?
- Speech before the Democratic National Committee, February
2, 2007
Where she stands:
In favor of lowering U.S. debt held by China.
For adopting tougher standards for goods imported
In favor of addressing currency manipulation
China
is a competitor, but they don't have to be an enemy as long as we
understand that they are going to be negotiating aggressively for
their advantage.
Where he stands:
Urges enforcing trade agreements.
For reducing the amount of U.S. debt held by Beijing.
Threatens to take China "to the mat" if it is manipulating the
value of its currency.
China
is a reality. The question is not whether they are going to emerge
on the world stage, the question is how.
Where he stands:
Warns that the rise of China and Russia warrants a larger, more
capable military.
Calls China's growing economic clout "a concern", does not address
how to handle.
We
need to do more to investigate, as John says, and we might even
have to look at the strategic petroleum reserve, which the Bush
administration has been filling up beyond any expectation of need
for the short term, at least. But we also have to have a serious
move toward energy efficiency and conservation.
Where she stands on...
Climate Change
Cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 through cap-and-trade system; require all publicly traded U.S. companies to file report on climate change risks with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Vehicle Fuel Economy
Boost corporate average fuel economy standards, or CAFE, to 55 miles per gallon by 2030, offer $20 billion in "green vehicle bonds" to help U.S. automakers meet standards, invest in plug-in hybrid technology.
Biofuels
60 billion gallons of biofuels available for trucks and cars by 2030.
Oil Use
Cut foreign oil imports by two-thirds from 2030 projected levels, more than 10 million barrels per day.
Electricity
Wants to require U.S. utilities to get 25 percent of their electricity from renewable sources like wind and solar by 2025.
As
Joe pointed out, out of the $90 that it's costing right now for
a barrel, about 30 percent of that is just risk. It's not dictated
by supply and demand. If we can lower the rhetoric, with respect
to military action in the Middle East, that will have an immediate
impact.
Where he stands on...
Climate Change
Cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050; reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020; require fuel suppliers to cut carbon content by 10 percent by 2020.
Vehicle Fuel Economy
Double fuel economy standards in 18 years, give automakers tax credits to retool plants and invest in advanced lightweight materials and new engines.
Biofuels
Boost renewable fuel standard to at least 60 billion gallons of advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol by 2030; build out ethanol distribution infrastructure; mandate that all new vehicles be "flexfuel" by the end of 2012; produce 2 billion gallons of "cellulosic" ethanol from non-corn sources like switchgrass by 2013.
Oil Use
Reduce overall oil consumption by at least 35 percent, or 10 million barrels per day, by 2030 to offset imports from OPEC nations.
Electricity
Backs 25 percent renewable requirement by 2025.
We have in use today a zero emission energy that could provide electricity for millions more homes and businesses than it currently does. Yet it has been over twenty-five years since a nuclear power plant has been constructed.
Where he stands on...
Climate Change
Favors cap-and-trade CO2 approach; sponsored legislation in 2007 to cut emissions by 30 percent by 2050.
Vehicle Fuel Economy
Has not specified CAFE targets. Voted against energy amendments in 2003 that would have boosted CAFE to 40 mpg by 2015.
Biofuels
Favors ethanol incentives after opposing them in the past. Generally opposes subsidies and tariffs that distort marketplace.
Oil Use
No specified targets. Has said he will unveil "a national energy strategy that will amount to a declaration of independence from the fear bred by our reliance on oil sheiks."
Electricity
Opposed 2005 proposal for 10 percent requirement, emphasizes market choice.
It is time for us to come together and start living up to our values, to provide quality affordable health care for every single American.
Where she stands:
Her health care plan, estimated to cost about $110 billion per year, would require all Americans to get health insurance. Under a public-private partnership, they would keep existing coverage or choose from private insurance options members of Congress receive. Individuals may also choose a public plan similar to Medicare. Plan creates new federal subsidies for those who can't afford coverage and imposes new mandates on large employers to provide health insurance or help pay for it. Small business will receive tax breaks to provide health coverage. Plan forces insurance companies to give coverage to everyone, ending discrimination based on pre-existing conditions. Drug companies would also be required to offer fair prices.
It's time to let the drug and insurance industries know that while they'll get a seat at the table, they don't get to buy every chair.
Where he stands:
His plan provides health coverage for almost all Americans. Creates national public insurance program to allow individuals and small businesses to buy affordable health care similar to that available to federal employees. No one will be turned way or charged more due to illness and everyone who needs it will receive a subsidy for their premiums. Requires all employers to contribute toward health coverage for their employees or toward the cost of the public plan. Creates a national health insurance exchange to reform the private insurance market. Mandates that all children have health care coverage.
Bringing costs under control is the only way to stop the erosion of affordable health insurance, save Medicare and Medicaid, protect private health benefits for retirees, and allow our companies to effectively compete around the world.
Where he stands:
Besides offering a refundable $2,500 tax credit, $5,000 for families, his plan would promote open health care markets by letting providers practice nationwide, rather than restricting them regionally, allowing families to purchase health insurance across state lines and through any willing sponsor.
I'm
in favor of ... getting 12 million or so immigrants out
of the shadows.
Where she stands:
Supports a guest worker program for immigrants if it does not undermine U.S. workers' wages and favors giving undocumented workers a way to become legal workers. Backed building border wall. Urges development of an employer verification system and higher penalties for employers who exploit illegal immigrants.
A president not only has to speak out forcefully against anti-immigrant sentiment ... but make sure all workers are taken care of.
Where he stands:
Backs additional personnel, infrastructure and technology to safeguard U.S. borders and ports. Urges reducing application fees and improving speed and accuracy of FBI background checks for immigrants. Supports a program in which illegal immigrants pay fines, learn English, not violate the law and go to the end of the line to become citizens. Backs creating a program for employers to verify an applicant's immigration status.
Americans want the borders secured first and that's what they're going to get from me as president.
Where he stands:
Initially supported temporary guest worker program that failed to advance in US Senate. Shifted his position to emphasize border security first.
"We've had an administration that doesn't believe in diplomacy. You know, they have every so often Condi Rice go around the world and show up some where and make a speech, and occasionally they even send Dick Cheney -- and that's hardly diplomatic in my view."
Where she stands:
Voted to designate Iran's Revolutionary Guard as terrorist a organization. Rules out unconditional talks with Iran but is willing to hold direct discussions under right circumstances; said the United States should be prepared to offer incentives if Tehran ends its nuclear weapons ambitions, renounces sponsorship of terrorism, supports Middle East peace and plays a constructive role in stabilizing Iraq.
Iran possessing nuclear weapons will be a major threat to us and to the region. ... If we have nuclear proliferations around the world that is a profound threat to the security of the United States.
Where he stands:
Has said he would engage in direct, personal talks with Iran which includes offering economic incentives if Tehran stopped operations in Iraq and cooperated on nuclear issues. He has refused to say if he would consider military action if Iran did not abandon its presumed nuclear weapons program. Offered a resolution in the Senate to reverse designating Iran's Revolutionary Guard as terrorist organization.
I'm not worried about Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon and putting it on a missile, I'm very worried about Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and giving it to terrorist organizations.
Where he stands:
Says he is open to using military force to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons but has asserted that plenty of other options were available before reaching that point. Has ruled out unconditional talks with Tehran, but instead would work with allies to apply pressure to stop Iran's actions in Iraq. Once joked about attacking Iran when asked about a possible strike, singing "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" which became a video sensation on the Internet.
If
we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009,
as president I will.
Where she stands:
Initially voted to authorize military action against Iraq but later said that if she knew then what she knows now, she would not have voted for it; steadfastly refused to apologize for the vote.
Has urged revoking congressional authorization for the war, capping troop levels at January 1, 2007 levels, and permitting US forces to provide training, counterterrorism activities and logistical support.
Opposes permanent bases in Iraq. If she is elected, she says upon her inauguration in January 2009 she would order the Pentagon to draw up a plan to begin bringing troops home within 60 days.
It
is long past time to turn the page in Iraq, where each
day we see the consequences of fighting a war that
should never have been authorized and should never have
been waged.
Where he stands:
Would begin immediately withdrawing from Iraq one or two brigades a month and have all troops out within 16 months; call a U.N.-led constitutional convention in Iraq that would not adjourn until reconciliation is reached; develop a regional security compact.
Would refocus energies on the al Qaeda threat in Afghanistan and Pakistan -- he has urged sending at least two more brigades to Afghanistan.
Rules out using nuclear weapons against al Qaeda or Taliban targets in Afghanistan or Pakistan, prompting charges that he was showing his inexperience. He supports strikes against al Qaeda targets in Pakistan if without cooperation from Islamabad.
I understand why so many Americans have become sick and tired of this war, given the many, many mistakes made by civilian and military leaders....I cannot react to these mistakes by embracing a course of action that I know would be an even greater mistake, a mistake of colossal and historical proportions.
Where he stands:
Backed adding troops to improve security, accelerating training and equipping Iraqi forces and police, and pushed for embedding soldiers in communities to help ensure insurgents cannot return. He called for an end to rotating commanders to avoid disrupting continuity in command. Wants pressure on Syria and Iran to stop activities in Iraq, but is against unconditional talks with Tehran and Damascus.
We have to change the tax system, and we've got to get back to having those with the most contribute to this country.
Where she stands:
Repeal Bush administration tax cuts for those making $250,000 or more annually. Make permanent tax relief for married couples that was part of Bush plan against "marriage tax." Offer college tuition tax deduction and credits for children and adoption. Has encouraged wage credits for businesses to boost job creation. Raise tax rate on "carried interest" gains made by senior partners in the private equity and hedge fund businesses.
There's no doubt that the tax system has been skewed. And the Bush tax cuts -- people didn't need them, and they weren't even asking for them, and that's why they need to be less, so that we can pay for universal health care and other initiatives.
Where he stands:
Proposed $500 per person payroll tax cut, universal mortgage tax credit of 10 percent and elimination of income taxes for seniors making less than $50,000. Close corporate tax loopholes and deductions for industries like the oil and gas businesses. Institute penalties for companies that keep their profits overseas.
Higher taxes and greater spending discourage entrepreneurship, foster wasteful tax-planning and slow long-term growth. Intelligently-formulated tax cuts and sensible tax reform will deliver much higher growth when they are accompanied by lower spending.
Where he stands:
Make permanent the tax cuts adopted during Bush administration. Have three-fifths majority in Congress required to approve tax increases. Advocates repealing Alternative Minimum Tax, creating tax credits for health, education and those with children.
The results of our October poll on presidential candidates and other issues facing U.S. voters.
Full poll results
Full poll results
1 of 7
Between Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, which candidate for President in 2008 do you believe can best manage U.S. foreign policy?
42%
Barack Obama
52%
John McCain
2%
Someone Else
4%
Not sure
Which of the following is most important to you in deciding who to vote for in the November presidential election?
62%
The Economy
9%
The War in Iraq
7%
Healthcare
8%
The Threat of another attack on the U.S.
2%
The Environment
2%
Energy prices
2%
Immigration
5%
Other
3%
Not sure
Does John McCain's choice of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin to be his running mate make you more likely to vote for McCain, less likely to vote for McCain, or does his choice have no effect on your decision?
26%
The choice makes me more likely to vote for McCain
30%
The choice makes me less likely to vote for McCain
43%
The choice has no effect on my decision
.5%
Not sure
Does Barack Obama's choice of Delaware Senator Joe Biden to be his running mate make you more likely to vote for Obama, less likely to vote for Obama, or does his choice have no effect on your decision?
26%
The choice makes me more likely to vote for Obama
15.5%
The choice makes me less likely to vote for Obama
58.5%
The choice has no effect on my decision
.4%
Not sure
Do you think Barack Obama has sufficient experience to be president?
48%
Yes
48%
No
3%
Not sure
Do you think Sarah Palin has sufficient experience to be vice president?
45%
Yes
51%
No
4%
Not sure
