Oct 5 (IFR) - Cement company Cemex’s resounding success and the better-rated SanLuis’s failure in tapping the bond markets last week proved an interesting study in how investors are making clear distinctions between Mexican single-B names, especially those emerging from recent restructurings.
Market memories are notoriously short, but investors are not buying junk debt indiscriminately. They are clearly asking for suitable compensation or pushing back entirely on entities that have a history of restructuring or voluntary defaults, even when credit metrics are improving.
A Mexican court ruling that allowed glassmaker Vitro to use inter-company debt to push through an unpopular restructuring plan is fresh in mind, not to mention losses from other recent bankruptcies in the country. Arguably a Vitro premium is alive and well - or at least the buyside is pricing in shareholders’ past behavior as well as the risks of fighting for creditors’ rights in local courts.
“With every high-yield Mexican company, whether or not it is fundamentally sound, we will have in the back of our minds the Vitro case,” said one investor.
Names like Durango trade in the mid teens and some investors were also asking for double digits from SanLuis, as it pushed for sub 10% pricing last week.
Cemex, on the other hand, trades in the single digits after winning praise for addressing the issue of inter-company loans when it laid out the terms of its recent refinancing proposal with banks in late June.
At the time, it said any inter-company claim would be subordinated and, in the event of local bankruptcy proceedings, called “consurso mercantil”, bank lenders would ultimately control the voting rights of such claims. This was seen as a nod to concerns over precedents set in the Vitro ruling.
While such wording may not be embedded in its bond covenants, Cemex (B-/B+) clearly benefits from such gestures. Also taking advantage of positive momentum created by its recent refinancing, and growing demand for high-yield names generally, Cemex was able to generate a US$7bn book Thursday before pricing a rare new-money 10-year that arguably paid just for its maturity extension or even came inside its curve.
“Cemex doing a 10-year is a strong statement to the market,” noted one rival banker. “They haven’t done a 10-year for new cash since they were investment-grade.”
By getting investor attention with whispers in the mid to high 9s, leads were able to tighten guidance to 9.375%-9.500% before pricing at par to yield at 9.375%. The outstanding 2020s were being spotted at anywhere from the high 8s to 9%, leaving a good 37.5bp differential between the two bonds. A final new issue premium was seen at anywhere between negative 20bp to positive 10bp-15bp.
Either way, the trade was largely seen as a success, as proceeds from the larger-than-expected US$1.5bn offering only serve to give the highly leveraged credit more breathing room. Alongside the planned IPO of its South and Central American operations, that reduces anxiety about its ability to meet a US$1bn debt payment due next March.
The recently completed refinancing of its financial agreement also allowed it to extend close to US$6.7bn in debt maturities from 2014 out to 2017, according to BTG Pactual, further adding to the company’s more optimistic outlook.
The new bond is also comparatively well collateralized, with essentially all its operations guaranteeing this instrument - except for the Central and South American units that are expected to be floated later this year.
This includes US operations Cemex Corp, which is now finally starting to turn a profit. “Cemex is the largest cement producer in the US and about third to a half of the value of the company,” said an analyst.
All this heightens comfort levels and should in theory bring some added value to this particular instrument versus others along the Cemex curve.
“It is significant. I think the difference is worth about 10 cents,” said a corporate debt analyst.
“The reality is, if Cemex went into bankruptcy, you have a serious amount of assets in the US - and you can file in the US courts - and there is nothing a Mexican court can do.”
However in a more bullish environment such as this one, investors are less inclined to make such distinctions. Indeed, the 2018s, with fewer guarantees, are trading at a tighter 8.9% versus a 9.10% seen on the 2018s that have similar guarantees to the new bond. Leads were JP Morgan, Barclays, RBS, Credit Agricole-CIB, HSBC and ING.
Car-parts manufacturer SanLuis Rassini (Ba3/B/B+) suffered a different fate after it was forced to postpone Tuesday its issuance of new 10-year non-call five bonds, despite improving credit metrics.
Accounts were already clearly suspicious of a company that had twice restructured its debt, but a broader distrust among market veterans already bitten by past defaults in Mexico meant SanLuis faced a particularly tough audience.
In the end, the company could not adhere to its goal of freeing itself from restrictive covenants on debt it was looking to refinance and, at the same time, achieve pricing of 10% or lower.
SanLuis had complied with requests to impose stricter debt incurrence restrictions, and even raised price guidance to 10% from initial whispers of high 9s, but investors remained on the fence, mostly because of the company’s history. Bank of America Merrill Lynch and JP Morgan were leads.
“They added the leverage covenants as we suggested, but we are still highly sceptical,” said one investor.
“The car business should be doing well. US car sales have been going up and a big chunk of imports are from Mexico, and SanLuis is well positioned to [benefit from that]. However, we don’t have much confidence,” the investor said.
For other related fixed-income quotations, stories and guides to Reuters pages, please double click on the symbol:
U.S. corporate bond price quotations...
U.S. credit default swap column........
U.S. credit default swap news..........
European corporate bond market report..
European corporate bond market report..
Credit default swap guide..............
Fixed income guide......
U.S. swap spreads report...............
U.S. Treasury market report............
U.S. Treasury outlook...
U.S. municipal bond market report......