* EU scientists warn against use in maize, rapeseed crops
* No link found between pesticides and bee colony collapse
* Commission says will take action if findings confirmed
* Pesticide makers say ban would hurt farm jobs, income
By Charlie Dunmore
BRUSSELS, Jan 16 (Reuters) - Three widely-used pesticides made by Switzerland’s Syngenta and Germany’s Bayer pose an acute risk to honeybees, the European Union’s food safety watchdog said on Wednesday, but stopped short of linking them to bee colony collapse.
Fears over the effects on bees of neonicotinoid insecticides - among the most commonly used crop pesticides in the world - led France to withdraw approval in June last year for Syngenta’s Cruiser OSR, used to treat rapeseed crops.
Responding to the opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Commission said it was ready to take the necessary steps if its findings are confirmed, raising the prospect of EU-wide restrictions on the use of the products.
The three pesticides analysed by EFSA were clothianidin and imidacloprid, both of which are primarily produced by Bayer’s agricultural unit Bayer CropScience, and Syngenta’s thiamethoxam, the active ingredient in Cruiser OSR.
EFSA said harmful pesticide residues in the pollen and nectar of plants treated with the three chemicals meant that they should only be used on crops not attractive to honeybees, such as sugarbeet. That would exclude their use on maize, rapeseed and sunflower crops.
Bees also face an acute risk from exposure to drifting pesticide dust following sowing of cereal seeds treated with the chemicals, including wheat and barley, EFSA said.
However, the EU scientists found no link between use of the pesticides and the phenomenon known as bee colony collapse disorder, which has seen bee populations fall rapidly in recent years across Europe and North America.
“Due to shortcomings in the data, EFSA was unable to finalise assessments for long-term risks to colony survival and development... and therefore conclusions could not be drawn on colony collapse disorder,” the opinion said.
Bayer CropScience said in a statement it did not believe EFSA’s findings altered the conclusions of previous EU assessments of its products, which found no unacceptable risks in their use.
“It is very important that any political decision relating to registrations of neonicotinoid-containing products should be based on clear scientific evidence of adverse effects of the affected products under realistic conditions of use,” the statement said.
A study by Britain’s Food and Environment Research Agency said last year that there was no evidence that use of neonicotinoids could cause the collapse of whole bee colonies.
Bees are important pollinators of flowering plants, including many fruit and vegetable crops. A 2011 U.N. report estimated that bees and other pollinators such as butterflies, beetles and birds do work worth 153 billion euros a year to the world economy.
EFSA said current gaps in the scientific data meant it had been unable to assess the risks posed to bees by some of the authorised uses of the pesticides, and there was a high level of uncertainty in its latest evaluation.
Pesticide manufacturers seized on the uncertainty in EFSA’s findings, and said the opinion provided no grounds to challenge the currently approved use of the chemicals.
“Restricting neonicotinoid pesticides on the basis of potential risks will do nothing to improve overall bee health but would do enormous damage to farming and food production in Europe,” Friedhelm Schmider, the head of European pesticide lobby ECPA, said in a statement.
A report published on Tuesday - commissioned by ECPA and the EU farmers’ association COPA-COGECA - found that current treatment of seeds using the three pesticides boosted EU commodity crop revenues by more than 2 billion euros a year, and said that 50,000 farm jobs could be lost if the products were banned.
The Commission’s health spokesman Frederic Vincent told a regular news briefing that EU government officials would discuss the findings at the end of the month, but that further research may be needed before drawing firm conclusions.
“As far as we’re concerned it’s quite clear. If the report and ensuing studies highlight that there is a problem with these products, then the Commission, together with member states, will take the necessary measures,” he said.