Reuters logo
Fitch Affirms Autonomous Community of Valencia at 'BBB-'; Outlook Stable
October 20, 2017 / 8:21 PM / a month ago

Fitch Affirms Autonomous Community of Valencia at 'BBB-'; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) BARCELONA, October 20 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Autonomous Community of Valencia's Long-Term Foreign and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BBB-' with Stable Outlooks. Fitch has also affirmed the Short-Term Foreign Currency IDR at 'F3'. The ratings on the region's senior unsecured outstanding bonds have been affirmed at 'BBB-'. The affirmation reflects the unchanged 'BBB-' rating floor applied to Spanish autonomous communities, including Valencia. This supports the region's 'BBB-' IDRs, which are higher than the region's intrinsic credit profile. Fitch will closely monitor liquidity support from the central government to Spanish regions. KEY RATING DRIVERS Valencia's IDRs are based on Fitch's expectation of state support, as captured by the 'BBB-' rating floor. The rating floor is based on a number of supporting factors that mitigate a region's liquidity risk, reducing the likelihood of default. These include the absolute priority of debt servicing by law as per article 135 of the Spanish Constitution; access to state liquidity mechanisms such as the Regional Liquidity Fund (FLA) and the Financial Facility Fund, and the budgetary stability law, which enforces fiscal discipline on local and regional governments. Central Government Support In Fitch's view, Valencia's access to the FLA will continue to ensure timely debt servicing in 2017. Eighty-three per cent of the regional government's outstanding direct debt at end-2016 was funded through the state support mechanisms, illustrating strong support from the central government. The central government ratified its financial support on 23 December 2014, introducing further measures to ease the debt burden of autonomous communities, including zero interest loans in 2015. As a result, interest costs for Valencia declined EUR878 million between 2014 and 2016. At end-2016, direct debt increased to EUR41.3 billion (EUR37.8 billion in 2015), although the direct debt-to-current revenue ratio was slightly lower at 354% (359% in 2015). Under Fitch's base case scenario, direct debt is expected to increase to over EUR42 billion-EUR44 billion by end-2017, but as a share of forecast current revenue further decline to 348%-355%. Valencia's long-term debt redemptions for 2017 are estimated at EUR3.4 billion and the region has requested to borrow at least EUR5.4 billion from the FLA, including EUR360 million for debt redemption in its public sector. During 1Q17 and 2Q17, support from the FLA was delayed due to the operational application of the mechanism at the beginning of the year. This led Valencia to directly service its debt by requesting advances from the 2015 funding system settlement and through its own recourse to alleviate peak liquidity demands. Fitch will monitor the efficiency of the liquidity mechanisms and the political commitment to provide liquidity to regions as part of the agency's rating floor assessment. In 2016, Valencia contracted EUR2.1 billion short-term debt and renewed EUR2.2 billion for 2017 for another 12 months. Of the latter, EUR1.1 billion was utilised in August 2017. Without central government support, pressure on debt servicing would have been high. As of end-2016, debt maturities for the next three years totalled EUR15 billion, representing 37% of outstanding direct debt at end-2016. However, this is mitigated by a large part being contracted through the state support mechanism. Weak Intrinsic Credit Profile Subject to Funding Reform Valencia's structurally negative current and operating balances since 2010, recurring overall budget deficits before debt repayment, high net overall risk and a weaker economic profile than Spain, mean that the regional government's intrinsic credit profile is weaker than the IDRs indicate. Under Fitch's base case scenario, the regional government's weak budgetary performance will be difficult to reverse in the near- to medium-term, unless there is a significant change in the current funding system. Valencia is underfunded compared with the average funding per capita of the 15 Spanish regions under the common regime and is reliant on reform to address this gap. Nevertheless, Valencia's 2016 result before net financing improved significantly by EUR2 billion from 2015, largely due to EUR1 billion higher resources from the funding system and lower interest costs. In 2017 and 2018, resources from the funding system will increase by a further EUR993 million and EUR84 million, respectively. Regional Economic Recovery Valencia has a weaker-than-average economic profile, with a GDP per capita 11.2% below Spain's average in 2016. However, Valencia's GDP grew 3.7% in 2016 (3.6% in Spain) to an estimated nominal EUR105 billion. The elderly represent a high share of Valencia's five million population, which may put pressure on health and social services. The labour market has improved as job creations in September 2017 increased by 14% since December 2013, after 21% of jobs were lost during 2007-2013. However, at 20.6% in 2016, the regional unemployment rate remains slightly higher than the national rate (19.6%). RATING SENSITIVITIES As Valencia's IDRs are supported by the 'BBB-' rating floor for Spanish autonomous communities, they would be downgraded by at least two notches if the floor is removed. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch assumes that the state will continue providing support to Spanish regions over the medium term. Moreover, Fitch will review the rating floor if state support measures are withdrawn or if the central government's ability and willingness to provide extraordinary support to the regions deteriorates. Discussions on the regional financial system are ongoing in Spain, and changes are in prospect over the medium term. Nevertheless, Fitch believes Valencia's revenue is unlikely to decrease as a result. Contact: Primary Analyst Julia Carner Analyst +34 93 323 8401 Fitch Ratings Espana, S.A.U. Av. Diagonal, 601, Barcelona 08028 Secondary Analyst Guilhem Costes Senior Director +34 93 323 8410 Committee Chairperson Guido Bach Senior Director +49 69 76 80 76 111 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com; Pilar Perez, Barcelona, Tel: +34 93 323 8414, Email: pilar.perez@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria International Local and Regional Governments Rating Criteria - Outside the United States (pub. 18 Apr 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below