October 3, 2017 / 10:26 AM / a year ago

Fitch Affirms Five Small and Mid-Sized Sri Lankan Banks

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) COLOMBO, October 03 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings Lanka has affirmed the National Long-Term Ratings on five small and mid-sized Sri Lankan banks. The banks are: -- Nations Trust Bank PLC (NTB) -- Pan Asia Banking Corporation PLC (PABC) -- Union Bank of Colombo PLC (UB) -- SANASA Development Bank PLC (SDB) -- Amana Bank PLC (Amana) A full list of rating actions is at the end of this commentary. The affirmations follow Fitch's periodic review of small and mid-sized Sri Lanka banks and are driven by the banks' intrinsic profiles. Fitch expects the banks' capitalisation to remain thin in the medium term, as they are likely to sustain a strong increase in loans. PABC, SDB and Amana infused capital to meet their respective minimum regulatory core capital levels. The impact of the implementation of SLFRS 9 in 2018 could also significantly reduce the banks' capital positions. The banks' absolute non-performing loans (NPLs) increased in 1H17, in line with our expectations. Fitch believes asset-quality risks are greater for these banks due to their greater exposure to retail and SME customer segments, which we see as more susceptible to economic downturns. KEY RATING DRIVERS NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT NTB's ratings reflect its declining capitalisation, modest franchise and high product concentration. NTB's capitalisation has come under pressure due to strong loan expansion (12.9% in 1H17 and 23.5% in 2016), which exceeded internal capital generation. Its Fitch Core Capital (FCC) and Tier 1 capital ratios continued decreasing to 10.7% and 10.6%, respectively, at end-1H17, from 12.2% and 12.1% at end-2015. NTB is a mid-size licensed commercial bank that had a modest market share gain to 2.5% of banking sector assets at end-1H17. Its current account, saving account (CASA) base decreased to 25.5% of deposits at end-1H17, from 32.5% at end-2015, similar to the trend seen across the sector. Product concentration remains high against peers, as leasing and credit cards accounted for 20.0% and 10.0%, respectively, of NTB's gross loans at end-1H17. Its gross NPL ratio decreased to 2.5% at end-1H17, from 2.8% at end-2015, despite an increase in absolute NPLs. PABC's rating reflects further deterioration in its asset-quality metrics during 1H17 relative to higher-rated peers, which has put pressure on the bank's improved capitalisation following its LKR2.1 billion rights issue in March 2017. The rating also reflects potential profitability pressure stemming from lower loan growth and higher credit costs. PABC's gross NPL ratio rose to 6.3% at end-1H17 from 4.7% at end-2016, due to a 32% growth in absolute NPLs stemming from high loan-growth periods. Its loan book expanded by just 1% in 1H17 as the bank focused on strengthening its book quality. PABC requires a further LKR1.3 billion to meet the minimum regulatory capital level of LKR10 billion by 1 January 2018. Fitch expects the bank to achieve this through retained profits in 2017, as further capital infusions are not expected. The bank's Tier 1 capital ratio increased to 10.8% at end-1H17, from 8.4% at end-2016. PABC's outstanding senior debentures are rated at the same level its National Long-Term Rating as they rank equally with the claims of its other senior unsecured creditors. The Outlook on UB's rating remains Positive to reflect the shift in UB's risk profile which is driven by structural changes in its loan book composition that could support better asset quality. This stems from more diversified customer exposures, which are similar to higher-rated peers. However, UB has continued to sustain a rapid increase in loans that could pressure asset quality if not managed prudently. In addition, NPLs stemming from subsidiary, UB Finance Co. Ltd (32% of total NPLs at end-1H17) remains a significant drag on the group's total NPLs. However, the bank's gross NPL ratio improved to 2.6% at end-1H17, from 3.6% at end-2015. UB's rating reflects its small franchise, weaker profitability and higher capitalisation relative to higher-rated peers. The bank accounted for just 1% of banking sector assets at end-1H17. Its profitability has been constrained by low net interest margins (NIM) and high cost structures. Fitch believes the bank is likely to focus on increasing exposure to more profitable customer segments and income generation to improve profitability. UB's FCC ratio fell to 19.4% at end-1H17, from 21.2% at end-2015, with sustained high loan growth of 14.4% in 1H17 and 38% in 2016. Fitch expects capitalisation to decline to levels similar to peers in the medium-term alongside continued rapid loan expansion. SDB's rating captures its high-risk appetite in terms of substantial exposure and rapid loan growth in the retail and lower-end SME segments. Fitch believes this could pressure the bank's capitalisation in the absence of capital raising, despite its LKR1.4 billion capital infusion in May 2017, as internal capital generation may be insufficient. SDB's profitability, as measured by return on assets, remained low due to its high operating and credit costs. This is despite a high NIM compared with peers, which reflects its target market segment. SDB's reported gross NPL ratio increased to 2.2% at end-1H17, from 2.1% at end-2016. Fitch expects asset quality to deteriorate as loans season. Amana's rating reflects its small and developing franchise and high risk appetite stemming from its predominant exposure to SME and retail segments. Amana began operations in 2011 and accounted for 0.6% of banking sector assets at end-1H17. There has been a large increase in the bank's capitalisation following a July 2017 rights issue to meet the higher 2018 regulatory minimum capital requirements. Fitch expects Amana's capitalisation ratios to moderate in the medium term from the estimated post-rights issue FCC ratio of 22.7% as the loan book expands. Amana's asset-quality metrics remain better than those of peers despite deterioration in the bank's gross NPL ratio to 1.5% at end-1H17 from 0.9% in 2016. Fitch expects asset-quality pressure to increase as the loan book seasons due to the bank's high SME and retail segment exposure of 75% of gross loans at end-2016. Amana remains mainly deposit funded and has maintained a stable CASA base relative to peers of over 50%. We expect the bank's profitability metrics to improve in the medium term relative to better-rated peers as it capitalises on existing infrastructure and enhances its franchise, leading to a lower cost/income ratio, despite potentially higher credit costs from asset-quality pressure and SLFRS 9 implementation. SUBORDINATED DEBT The Basel II compliant Sri Lanka rupee-denominated subordinated debt of NTB and PABC are rated one notch below the banks' National Long-Term Ratings to reflect subordination to senior unsecured creditors. RATING SENSITIVITIES NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT NTB's rating could be downgraded if there is a continued decline in capitalisation seen through sustained strong loan expansion in the absence of capital raisings. Increased capital impairment risk through continuous asset-quality deterioration could also result in a downgrade. An upgrade is contingent upon lower product concentration, a significant increase in capitalisation and a more stable funding profile alongside progress in building a stronger commercial banking franchise. The upgrade of UB's rating is contingent upon its ability to manage risks from continued high loan growth, despite structural changes to its loan composition, which would be reflected through sustained asset-quality improvement. The improvement in UB's financial profile to levels similar to higher-rated peers could also support an upgrade. Capital impairment risks stemming from sustained rapid loan expansion or asset-quality deterioration could pressure UB's rating. SDB's rating could be downgraded if there is a continued deterioration in capitalisation, either through aggressive loan growth or greater unprovided NPLs. An upgrade would be contingent upon moderation of its risk appetite and sustainable improvements in asset quality and profitability. Fitch does not see upside potential for PABC's ratings in the near term, as the bank may face difficulty is sustaining adequate capital buffers similar to higher-rated peers. PABC's rating would be downgraded if loss-absorption buffers further deteriorate, either through a greater share of unprovided NPLs, aggressive loan-book growth or weaker internal capital generation. A rating upgrade for Amana is contingent upon the expansion of the bank's franchise and improved and sustained financial profile, in particular, achieving profitability levels that are similar to higher-rated peers. Deterioration in loss-absorption buffers, either through excessive growth above management forecasts or a greater share of unprovided NPLs, could put downward pressure on Amana's rating. Senior debt ratings will move in tandem with the banks' National Long-Term Ratings. SUBORDINATED DEBT Subordinated debt ratings will move in tandem with the banks' National Long-Term Ratings. The rating actions are as follows: Nations Trust Bank PLC National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'A(lka)'; Stable Outlook Basel II-compliant subordinated debentures affirmed at 'A-(lka)' Pan Asia Banking Corporation PLC National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'BBB-(lka)'; Stable Outlook Senior debenture rating affirmed at 'BBB-(lka)' Subordinated debenture rating affirmed at 'BB+(lka)' Union Bank of Colombo PLC National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'BB+(lka); Positive Outlook SANASA Development Bank PLC National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'BB+(lka)'; Stable Outlook Amana Bank PLC National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'BB(lka)'; Stable Outlook Contact: Primary Analysts Rukshana Thalgodapitiya, CFA (NTB and UB) Vice President +94 11 2541 900 Fitch Ratings Lanka Ltd. 15-04, East Tower, World Trade Center Colombo 1, Sri Lanka Jeewanthi Malagala, CFA (PABC and Amana) Analyst +9411 2541 900 Sugath Alwis, CFA (SDB) Analyst +9411 2541 900 Secondary Analysts Nadika Ranasinghe, CFA (PABC) Vice President +94 11 2541 900 Jeewanthi Malagala, CFA (SDB) Analyst +9411 2541 900 Sugath Alwis, CFA (UB and Amana) Analyst +9411 2541 900 Kanishka de Silva, CFA (NTB) Analyst +94 11 2541 900 Committee Chairperson Jonathan Lee Senior Director +886 2 8175 7601 Note to editors: Fitch's National ratings provide a relative measure of creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The best risk within a country is rated 'AAA' and other credits are rated only relative to this risk. National ratings are designed for use mainly by local investors in local markets and are signified by the addition of an identifier for the country concerned, such as 'AAA(lka)' for National ratings in Sri Lanka. Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable. Central Finance Company PLC, which owns 20% of NTB, also owns 1.79% of the shares in Fitch Ratings Lanka Ltd. No shareholder, other than Fitch Inc., is involved in the day-to-day operations of, or credit rating reviews undertaken by, Fitch Ratings Lanka Ltd. Media Relations: Bindu Menon, Mumbai, Tel: +91 22 4000 1727, Email: bindu.menon@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Additional Disclosures Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below