October 30, 2017 / 7:55 AM / in 2 months

Fitch: China Party Congress Points to Preserving SOE Strength

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SHANGHAI/SINGAPORE, October 30 (Fitch) China's Party Congress last week further indicated that the authorities will seek to maintain the dominance of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in key strategic sectors and will promote the role of SOEs in driving sectoral shifts and advances up the value chain to support economic development, says Fitch Ratings. The reform agenda will continue to focus on consolidation, with the aim of creating national champions that can lead development. An increase in hybrid ownership structures is also likely, as the government looks to increase its presence in emerging sectors. The authorities are unlikely to consider a reduction in SOEs' market position to tackle corporate sector inefficiencies, at least in the medium term. Instead, the government will use consolidation and capacity cuts in sectors experiencing severe oversupply to increase SOE productivity. There are currently 98 SOEs under the supervision of the central State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. This is likely to fall to less than 90 over the next 12-18 months, with mergers most likely in the power, defence, construction and machinery sectors. Consolidation will include horizontal mergers to create entities with larger market share and greater economies of scale, as well as vertical mergers to enhance cost efficiencies along the supply chain and smooth profit volatility. The August 2017 announcement of a consolidation of Shenhua and Guodian, for example, contained elements of both, creating China's largest power producer and coal mining company. The authorities are likely to expect newly combined entities to play a strategic role in executing reform priorities. These companies will also have a mandate to lead sector development by focussing on high-value-added activities and products and to drive investment in strategic emerging sectors that can be integrated within their core businesses. Non-core subsidiaries, particularly loss making entities, are likely to be divested during integration to lower the financial burden on the combined entity. So far, this has not resulted in large layoffs, as SOEs have found solutions for labour settlement and redeployment. However, scope for redeployment is shrinking, with heavy industry creating fewer jobs as the economy shifts to higher-value-added and service industries. This could constrain efforts to curtail overcapacity, as mass lay-offs, like those following the mid-1990s SOE reforms, would be politically unpalatable and therefore unlikely. Hybrid ownership structures are another important component of the government's corporate reform agenda. This includes private investment in SOEs as part of a long-standing strategy to improve the entities' management and performance, as well as SOE cross-holdings that aim to lower risks to the value of state-owned assets and form strategic alliances, although the benefits of the latter are yet to be seen. SOE investment in private companies is also becoming increasingly common. The government could be using this approach to obtain stakes in private companies that are highly influential in 'new' strategic sectors, allowing it to monitor and manage financial risks and steer decisions that could affect the broader economy. This could mean companies might not always act solely for financial reasons. The government is also likely to see investment in private companies as a way to pivot away from declining traditional SOE sectors towards those with higher return and growth potential. This is in keeping with SOE investment in joint funds that target new-economy sectors, such as renewables, IT, logistics, finance and AI. These investments could integrate well with SOEs' core businesses and facilitate economic re-balancing, but there is also a risk that misguided decisions will be taken by SOEs that lack investment experience and are stepping into unfamiliar areas. Policy driven over-investment is also a risk, with low-end new-energy vehicles already looking like a cautionary example. Contact: Ying Wang Senior Director Corporates +86 21 5097 3010 Fitch Ratings (Beijing) Limited - Shanghai Branch 3401, 34/F, Shanghai Tower No.479, Lujiazuihuan Road, Pudong Shanghai 200120, China Dan Martin Senior Analyst Fitch Wire +65 6796 7232 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com. The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below