September 21, 2017 / 9:19 AM / in 10 months

Fitch: Morocco Reserve Fall Unlikely to Prompt FX Policy Shift

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) HONG KONG/LONDON, September 21 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings still expects an eventual widening of the Moroccan dirham's floating bands, despite the fall in foreign-currency reserves in 2Q17. Reserves have now bottomed out and we expect the authorities to implement gradual alterations to the foreign exchange framework while trying to achieve a more robust anchoring of policy expectations by fine-tuning their communication strategy. A broadening of the dirham's floating bands was widely expected at end-June, but the announcement was postponed against the backdrop of a rapid fall in foreign exchange reserves. Morocco's net international reserves (NIR) had dropped by 14.3% in US dollar terms at 7 July from their end-April level, reaching USD20.9 billion, their lowest level in nearly two years. Consequently, the goods and services import coverage ratio receded to just above five months in July, down from seven at end-December 2016 based on Bank al-Maghrib (BAM) estimates. The NIR drop partly reflected residents buying foreign-currency instruments for hedging or profit ahead of the expected end-June announcement. Moroccan banks increased their foreign-currency assets by 56%, equivalent to USD1.6 billion, between 28 April and 7 July. The sharp fall of the Egyptian pound following full liberalisation and recent pressures on the exchange rate in Tunisia might have stoked fears of substantial dirham depreciation, although the likelihood of this is very low in our view. The Egyptian pound was widely judged to be substantially over-valued, while the dirham is close to its equilibrium value. The decline is also due to higher balance-of-payments outflows. Higher amortisation than drawings, partly related to the late approval of the 2017 budget, pushed the government's net foreign loan financing down to -USD0.52 billion in the first seven months of 2017 from USD0.23 billion a year earlier. Higher oil prices contributed to a USD0.6 billion widening in the goods and services trade deficit. FDI outflows rose threefold on purchase of foreign assets by residents, including the regional expansion of the domestic banking sector. The gradual disbursement of foreign financing and the tighter scrutiny of foreign exchange transactions should support a further partial recovery of the reserve-to-import ratio. Reserve losses due to hedging strategies may be gradually reversed but the contribution of higher other balance-of-payments outflows could be more enduring. Morocco's NIR have already bottomed out, rising by USD2 billion from early July. The authorities' plan is to widen the floating bands to +/-2.5% from +/-0.3%, according to a statement by Prime Minister Othmani. The phasing-in of a full float regime is only a long-term prospect in our view. As the floating bands will initially be relatively narrow, the direct benefits for external competitiveness and economic shock-absorption capacity will still be modest. However, it would be an important step towards more flexible exchange rates that could help provide a buffer against external shocks and increase BAM's leeway to gear monetary policy towards inflation targeting. We would expect even a more substantial widening of the bands to pose little risk to macroeconomic stability, given banks' low foreign-currency exposure and the high share of dirham-denominated government debt. We expect dirham volatility to remain limited after the widening (the exchange rate is broadly aligned with fundamentals), although renewed temporary pressures on reserves are possible. Foreign exchange reserves and the IMF's precautionary and liquidity line are buffers to exchange rate pressures. <a href="">Peer Review: Major Moroccan Banks <a href="">MENA Sovereign Credit Overview Contact: Mahmoud Harb Director, Sovereigns +852 2263 9917 Fitch (Hong Kong) Ltd 19/F Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central Hong Kong Jan Friederich Senior Director Sovereigns +852 2263 9910 Mark Brown Senior Analyst, Fitch Wire +44 20 3530 1588 Media Relations: Francoise Alos, Paris, Tel: +33 1 44 29 91 22, Email:; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email:; Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below