Reuters logo
Fitch Publishes Jinan West City Investment and Development's 'BBB' Rating
October 19, 2017 / 10:09 AM / a month ago

Fitch Publishes Jinan West City Investment and Development's 'BBB' Rating

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) HONG KONG, October 19 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has published Jinan West City Investment and Development Group Co., Ltd.'s (JWC) Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of 'BBB'. The Outlook is Stable. At the same time, Fitch has assigned JWC's existing senior unsecured US dollar notes a rating of 'BBB'. The offshore notes were issued by JWC directly. The notes are rated at the same level as JWC's Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR because they are direct, unconditional, unsubordinated and senior unsecured obligations of JWC. KEY RATING DRIVERS Linked to Jinan Municipality: JWC's ratings are credit linked to, but not equalised with, Fitch's internal assessment of the creditworthiness of Jinan Municipality. The link reflects strong oversight and supervision of JWC by the municipal government, integration of JWC with the municipal budget, and the strong strategic importance of JWC's public-sector business to the municipality. These factors indicate that JWC is likely to receive extraordinary support from the municipal government, if needed. JWC is classified as a credit-linked public-sector entity under Fitch's criteria. Jinan's Creditworthiness: Jinan is the provincial capital of Shandong, the third-largest economy in terms of gross regional product (GRP) in China in 2016. The municipal economy is largely driven by tertiary industries, such as tourism and logistics, and tax revenue accounted for around 64% of total operating revenue in past three years. Strong Strategic Importance: The municipality in 2017 consolidated four local government financing vehicles (LGFVs) into two to eliminate unnecessary competition. JWC's main goal - to develop a 450 sq km area in western Jinan - remains unchanged after the consolidation, which indicates the entity's importance to the municipal government. JWC's business includes land development, urban infrastructure development, and operation and management of state-owned assets. Mid-Range Legal Status: JWC will continue to be a wholly state-owned limited liability company under the Chinese company law. There will not be any asset transfers between JWC, its newly formed parent and its fellow subsidiaries. Tight Control and Supervision: JWC is directly managed, supervised and owned by its parent group, which is in turn managed and supervised by the Jinan Finance Bureau. The parent is wholly owned and controlled by the Jinan Finance Bureau. The major strategic plans, funding plans and capex budget of JWC need to be approved by the government before execution. The Jinan Finance Bureau has tighter control over JWC's debt level compared with other LGFVs controlled by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) of Jinan. The Jinan Finance Bureau directly injects capital and provides subsidies and other policy support, such as rebates on land-use rights costs, to JWC. Mid-Range Integration: JWC relies heavily on explicit and implicit support from the provincial government. The most important government support for JWC is in the form of land use rights; the government also provides financial subsidies on urban infrastructure projects and other types of support. Weak Standalone Profile: JWC's standalone credit profile is constrained by the public-service nature of its primary-land development business. JWC also holds a large amount of public-sector assets that generate low profitability on behalf of the government. The company's businesses that are commercially operated are very limited and are not able to make up for the losses from the public services it provides. The strategic link with the Jinan Municipality could lead to a fair level of extraordinary government support, if needed. RATING SENSITIVITIES A stronger or more explicit support commitment from the Jinan municipal government may trigger a positive rating action on JWC. Significant changes to JWC's strategic importance, a dilution in municipal shareholding, or reduced explicit and implicit governmental support could lead to a wider gap between JWC's ratings and Fitch's internal view of the creditworthiness of Jinan. An upgrade of Fitch's internal view on the creditworthiness of Jinan may trigger a positive rating action on JWC. A weaker fiscal performance or heightened indebtedness of the provincial government could lead to a lowering of Fitch's internal assessment of JWC's creditworthiness and thus may trigger a negative rating action on JWC. Contact: Primary Analyst Terry Gao Senior Director +852 2263 9972 Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited 19/F Man Yee Building 68 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong Secondary Analyst Lorraine Liu Associate Director +852 2263 9929 Committee Chairperson Vladimir Redkin Senior Director +7 495 956 2405 Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria International Local and Regional Governments Rating Criteria - Outside the United States (pub. 18 Apr 2016) here Rating of Public-Sector Entities – Outside the United States (pub. 22 Feb 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below