December 22, 2016 / 6:22 PM / 2 years ago

Fitch Affirms Unicredit Bank AG at 'A-'; Negative Outlook

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) LONDON, December 22 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Unicredit Bank AG's (HVB) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A-' and its Viability Rating (VR) at 'a-'. The Outlook on the Long-Term IDR is Negative. A full list of rating actions is available at the end of this commentary. The rating action follows the affirmation of UniCredit S.p.A.'s (UC) Long-Term IDR at 'BBB+'/Negative' (see "Fitch Affirms UniCredit at 'BBB+' Negative Outlook"). The Negative Outlook on HVB's Long-Term IDR mirrors that of UC. A downgrade of UC's Long-Term IDR could result in a downgrade of HVB's Long-Term IDR and VR, and the Outlook reflects the potential negative implications of a deterioration of UC's financial strength for HVB's capitalisation and financial flexibility. Such deterioration could, in our opinion, result in a need to upstream further capital from HVB to UC. We believe that the increased fungibility of capital within the UC group could constrain HVB's financial flexibility. KEY RATING DRIVERS - IDRs, VRs AND SENIOR DEBT HVB's IDRs and senior debt ratings reflect the bank's standalone credit strength as expressed by its VR. The VR reflects the bank's strong capitalisation, which remains well above its peer group's average even after the planned dividend payment to UC. The VR also reflects the bank's company profile, which benefits from its well-established domestic corporate and investment banking franchise, its solid asset quality, which benefits from the resilient German economy and its profitability, which is the result of stable contributions from commercial banking with potentially more volatile earnings from corporate and investment banking. HVB's VR reflects our assumption that UC's strategic plan announced last week will not have a material impact on HVB's standalone strength. The measures, which include the payment of a EUR3bn special dividend from HVB to UC in May 2017, confirm our expectation that capital is increasingly managed across the UC group. However, we expect HVB's capitalisation to remain in line with its VR, which is one notch above UC's VR. In Fitch's view, intragroup contagion risk means that a subsidiary's VR would not typically be rated more than a notch above its parent's within the eurozone. HVB's fully loaded common equity tier 1 ratio (CET1) will drop to about 19% from 22.3% at end-2Q16 as a direct effect of the special dividend payment. At the same time, the bank's leverage ratio is expected to fall to about 5% from 6% at end-2Q16. Therefore, HVB will remain strongly capitalised and we expect that the bank will comfortably exceed current and future regulatory requirements. In addition, UC and HVB have agreed with their respective national regulators that HVB's own funds ratio must not fall below 13%. UC has stated that it assumes a single-point-of-entry resolution model, continuing to operate under its current parent bank structure. We believe that further material cross-border transfers of capital and liquidity to the parent could become more likely under this approach, and that capital will become more fungible between legal entities. DCR AND DEPOSIT RATINGS HVB's DCR and Deposit Ratings are aligned with its IDRs. The bank's qualifying junior and vanilla/non-structured senior debt buffers are large, but Fitch believes that the sustainability of these buffers is not yet clear. This is because there are still some uncertainties on the timing of UC's plans to allocate total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) resources within the group, which could change HVB's liabilities structure over the medium term. SUPPORT RATING HVB's Support Rating (SR) reflects our opinion that there is a moderate likelihood of extraordinary support from its parent UC if needed. This probability of support indicates a 'BB' Long-term rating floor based on institutional support. The SR reflects Fitch's view that UC has a strong propensity to support HVB, but its ability to provide support, in our opinion, is constrained by the likely large size of any solvency support that would be required relative to the capital available in the rest of the group, given that a large proportion of UC's consolidated equity is in HVB. Our view that the parent's propensity to support is strong is primarily based on HVB's role in the UC group, for which it acts as the investment banking hub and operates a sizeable corporate banking franchise in Europe's largest economy. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND HYBRID SECURITIES The ratings of HVB's hybrid capital instruments (issued through HVB Funding Trusts I and II) are notched from the bank's VR. These instruments are rated four notches below the VR, two notches for loss severity and two notches for incremental non-performance risk. While Fitch acknowledges that the regulator could demand a deferral of coupon payment on these profit-linked instruments in line with the terms and conditions of the instruments, the agency does not expect such intervention in light of the bank's solid standalone financial profile. RATING SENSITIVITIES - IDRs, VRs AND SENIOR DEBT HVB's IDRs and VR are primarily sensitive to a change in UC's IDRs. A downgrade of UC's ratings would lead to a downgrade of HVB's ratings because Fitch believes that a weakening of UC's financial strength would increase the risk of upstreaming further capital from HVB to UC. HVB's ratings could be affirmed at their current level if UC's ratings are affirmed and if HVB demonstrates that it can maintain strong capitalisation and adequate internal capital generation through retained earnings. We understand that HVB has considerably reduced its net funding exposure to its parent and to other group entities. We understand that the bank currently has no plans for further extraordinary dividend payments exceeding HVB's annual profit. HVB's VR and IDR are also sensitive to increasing integration and capital and funding fungibility with the rest of the UC group, which we believe is likely under the SSM and SRM. Under Fitch's criteria, highly integrated subsidiary banks that account for a large proportion of the group's consolidated assets and contribute to the group's overall credit profile can be assigned common VRs with their parent. If capital movements between legal entities within the group become less restricted, and if we conclude that as a result it has become impossible to separate the credit profiles of the group's largest subsidiaries, we would likely assign common VRs to UC and HVB. HVB's VR, and therefore IDR, would then converge with UC's ratings, which are currently a notch below HVB's. HVB's VR and IDRs are also sensitive to a decline in HVB's recurring operating profitability in combination with increasing loan impairment charges, above normalised levels, which is unlikely, in our view. RATING SENSITIVITIES - DCR AND DEPOSIT RATINGS HVB's DCR and Deposit Ratings are primarily sensitive to changes in its IDRs. The DCR and Deposit Ratings could be notched above HVB's IDRs if Fitch concludes that the bank's qualifying junior and vanilla senior debt buffers are sustainably sufficient to restore viability and prevent a default on derivative obligations and deposits after a failure. Fitch believes that further clarity on the sustainability of these buffers should become available when UC starts to downstream internal TLAC into HVB. The DCR and Deposit Ratings are also sensitive to future changes to the resolution regime, which may alter the hierarchy of the various instruments in resolution, although this is not our current expectation in Germany. SUPPORT RATING The SR is sensitive to significant changes to UC's ability to support HVB that could be indicated by a change to UC's ratings. It is also sensitive to any negative changes to Fitch's view of UC's propensity to provide support, which we currently do not expect. We would withdraw HVB's SR if we decide to assign a common VR to UC and HVB. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND HYBRID SECURITIES HVB's subordinated debt and hybrid securities' ratings are sensitive to changes of HVB's VR or to a change in their notching, which could arise if Fitch changes its assessment of the notes' loss severity or relative non-performance risk. The rating actions are as follows: UniCredit Bank AG Long-term IDR affirmed at 'A-'; Negative Outlook Short-term IDR affirmed at 'F2' Viability Rating affirmed at 'a-' Derivative Counterparty Rating affirmed at 'A-(dcr)' Long Term Deposit Rating affirmed at 'A-' Short Term Deposit Rating affirmed at 'F2' Support Rating affirmed at '3' Senior unsecured certificates of deposit affirmed at 'F2' Senior unsecured debt issuance programme affirmed at 'A-'/'F2' Senior unsecured MTN programme affirmed at 'A-' Senior unsecured EMTN programme affirmed at 'A-'/'F2' Senior unsecured notes affirmed at 'A-' Subordinated notes affirmed at 'BBB+' HVB Funding Trusts I and II hybrid capital notes affirmed at 'BB+' Contact: Primary Analyst Patrick Rioual Director +49 69 7680 76 123 Fitch Deutschland GmbH Neue Mainzer Strasse 46-50 60311 Frankfurt Secondary Analyst Sebastian Schrimpf Analyst +49 69 7680 76 136 Committee Chairperson Christian Scarafia Senior Director +44 20 3530 1012 Media Relations: Elaine Bailey, London, Tel: +44 203 530 1153, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1016994 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below