November 7, 2012 / 2:45 PM / 5 years ago

TEXT-Fitch rates Jacksonville, Fla.'s special revs 'AA'

Nov 7 - Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'AA' to the following revenue
bonds to be issued by the City of Jacksonville, Florida (the city):

--$197,410,000 special revenue refunding bonds, series 2012C;
--$12,535,000 special revenue refunding bonds, series 2012D;
--$35,065,000 taxable special revenue refunding bonds, series 2012E;
--$125.1 million capital improvement refunding revenue bonds, series 2012.

The special revenue bonds are scheduled for negotiated sale on Nov. 15. Proceeds
will refund all of the city's outstanding excise taxes revenue bonds, along with
a portion of the city's guaranteed entitlement revenue bonds, and local
government sales tax revenue bonds. The city is presently estimating net present
value (NPV) savings of $34.8 million or 13.1% of refunded par.

The capital improvement revenue bonds are scheduled for negotiated sale on Dec.
5. Proceeds will refund all of the city's outstanding capital improvement
revenue bonds, series 1997, 1998, 2002A, 2002B, and 2002C. The city is presently
estimating NPV savings of $19.2 million or 14.1% of refunded par.

In addition, Fitch affirms the following ratings:

--Implied unlimited general obligations (ULTGO) at 'AA+';
--Approximately $685.5 million special revenue bonds at 'AA';
--Approximately $136 million capital improvement revenue bonds at 'AA' (these
bonds are expected to be refunded from the current offering).

The Rating Outlook is Stable for all bonds.


The special revenue bonds are secured by the city's covenant to budget and
appropriate non-ad valorem revenues, by amendment if necessary. The availability
of non-ad valorem revenues to pay debt service is subject to the funding of
essential government services and obligations with a specific lien on non-ad
valorem revenues. The issuer's non-ad valorem covenant is cumulative and
continues until the bonds have been fully paid. The bonds are not secured by a
debt service reserve fund (DSRF).

The capital improvement revenue bonds are secured by a lien upon receipts from a
2% convention development tax (CDT), a 1% professional sports facility tourist
development tax (TDT), certain franchise fees, a portion of the local option
communication service tax (CST), and a fixed sales tax rebate authorized
pursuant to state law to certified applicants for the attracting or retaining of
professional sports franchises. The CDT and TDT are each a tax on transient
rental accommodations. The refunding revenue bonds, series 2012 will be secured
by a cash funded DSRF equal to maximum annual debt service (MADS); outstanding
bonds are secured by a DSRF funded by a combination of cash ($5.4 million) and
surety policies ($6.1 million).


RATINGS CAPPED AT CITY IMPLIED ULTGO: The implied ULTGO rating of the city
('AA+'; Stable Outlook) provides the ceiling for all of Jacksonville's other
tax-supported ratings.

COVENANT DEBT: A one-notch distinction between the special revenue bond rating
and the implied ULTGO rating reflects the absence of a pledge of specific
revenue and inability to compel the city to raise non-ad valorem revenue
sufficient to pay debt service. Covenant revenues are diverse and are expected
to continue to provide adequate debt service coverage given the reliance on
these revenues to fund operations.

accommodations and communication services remain somewhat volatile, but have
shown some signs of recent stability. MADS coverage is projected at 1.79x post
refunding and no additional leveraging is expected.

SOLID FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: The implied GO rating of 'AA+' is based on the
city's history of sound financial management evidenced by consistent operating
surplus and growth in reserves and introduction of recurring solutions to solve
recent budgetary challenges.

WEAK PENSION PICTURE: Of increasing concern to Fitch is the city's significant
unfunded pension liability, particularly for public safety employees. Pension
costs have risen dramatically and consume an increasing share of discretionary
resources that generally limits overall financial flexibility.

AVERAGE DEBT: Key debt ratios and annual servicing costs are considered average
by Fitch. Future capital needs and borrowing plans appear manageable.

STABLE ECONOMY: Jacksonville's economy is anchored by the presence of the U.S.
Navy and trade and transportation activity at the Port of Jacksonville.
Employment levels continue to grow at a good pace, but unemployment remains
somewhat high and income levels are average.


FAILURE TO CONTROL PENSION COSTS: The city is in the process of unveiling
pension reform measures with the hope that changes to the pension system may be
negotiated and implemented by fiscal 2014. The failure to do so for any reason
could lead to negative pressure on the rating.



Entering fiscal 2012 the city's unrestricted fund balance (the sum of the
unassigned, assigned, and committed fund balance under GASB 54) totaled $123.8
million or a sound 12.7% of spending. Fiscal 2011 marked the sixth consecutive
year of surplus operating results after transfers, during which time a total of
$66.4 million was added to reserves. Fitch considers this record impressive
considering the challenges posed by property tax reform, the housing market
collapse, and recession.

The city is forecasting a $13.8 million addition to fund balance in fiscal 2012.
The surplus stems from expenditures that are projected to be $26.5 million below
budget, primarily related to personnel spending. The city consistently
underspends its appropriations, a trend that reflects its careful budget
monitoring and controls and commitment to financial stability.

The city has adopted a balanced budget for fiscal 2013 closing a preliminary gap
of $68.7 million. Almost 550 jobs were eliminated from the budget, including 225
by layoff. The city had eliminated budget gaps aggregating approximately $100
million in fiscal 2011 and 2012. While these cuts are significant in scope
relative to the general fund budget, management believes there remains capacity
to achieve savings that would not dramatically impact service provision.

The fiscal 2013 budget does not appropriate existing reserves. The millage rate
is held constant for a third consecutive year at 10.04 which is well below the
city's statutory limit of 20 mills and considered by Fitch competitive to the
combined city/county tax rate of other major Florida metro areas. The city's
taxable assessed value (TAV) has not yet stabilized, however, declining 4.8% in
fiscal 2013. Budgeted revenues and transfers in are lower by 1% from the fiscal
2012 budget. The budget re-appropriates $11 million in efficiency savings within
the sheriff's 2012 budget for citywide purposes. There does not appear to be any
other notable reliance on one-time sources.


The city's pension burden is considered high, particularly for the 'AA+' implied
ULTGO rating. For all city plans the Fitch-adjusted funded ratio (which assumes
a 7% investment rate of return) is very weak at 50.5%, and the unfunded
actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) a significant $2.67 billion or 3.3% of market
value (MV).

In fiscal 2013 the city has budgeted approximately $150 million in pension
costs, of which $122 million is related to police and fire. The city continues
to fully fund the actuarial required contribution (ARC) which Fitch considers
favorably. However, the city's pension contribution will consume more than 15%
of general fund spending; in comparison, in fiscal 2006 the city paid $65.3
million for pension or 7.7% of spending.

The spike in pension contributions reflects market losses incurred during the
recession (which are smoothed over a five-year period) and a reduction in the
assumed investment rate of return (now 7.75% for police and fire and 8.25% for
general employees and correction officers). Pension costs are forecast to rise
more modestly over the near term, reaching $183 million by fiscal 2017.

The city has recently ratified new labor contracts with its police and fire
unions expected to yield approximately $8 million in annual savings. While Fitch
views these concessions favorably, they effectively offset a very small portion
of the recent increased pension costs.


The city is forecasting non-ad valorem revenue of $508.2 million in fiscal 2012
(a 1.4% year-over-year increase). Fiscal 2012 budgeted non-ad valorem revenues
include utility taxes ($132.5 million), contributions from the electric and
water and sewer utility operations of the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA)
($104.2 million), the city's share of one-half cent local government sales tax
($74.3 million), and franchise fees ($44.2 million).

The city is proposing certain 'springing' amendments to the anti-dilution test
that are, in Fitch's view, neutral to credit quality and consistent with other
Florida non-ad valorem transactions. Fitch considers risk to over-leveraging
limited by the city's reliance on non-ad valorem revenue to fund operations.


The capital improvement revenue bonds likewise benefit from good revenue
diversity, but the key components of the revenue stream, the CDT, TDT, and CST,
generally exhibit a fair degree of economic volatility. The fixed nature of the
sales tax rebate from the state somewhat mitigates this risk, but that component
comprises only $2 million annually or approximately 19% of MADS of $10.5 million
(projected post-refunding).

Fiscal 2012 pledged revenues were up 1.7% (unaudited) on the year to $18.7
million due to gains in the CDT and TDT. MADS is expected to be lower by about
$1 million post-refunding improving MADS coverage to 1.79x from 1.59x in fiscal
2011. Fitch estimates that existing pledged revenues can decline by as much as
44% before coverage would fall below 1.0x (or approximately 4x the cumulative
loss experience during the recession).

Fitch notes the various pledged revenues are essentially levied at their
respective maximum permissible rate. Additional new money bonds are not
presently contemplated (the additional bonds test requires 1.5x MADS


Overall debt (including overlapping debt of the county school board) is equal to
3.8% of MV or $3,732 per capita. The city continues to revise its capital plan
lower. Fitch does not anticipate a major change in the city's debt profile as
future borrowing is expected to vary from $30 million to $65 million annually
during the 2013-2017 capital improvement plan (CIP) period. The amount of debt
to be issued is notably lower than the amount of outstanding debt scheduled to
amortize over the same period.

In fiscal 2013 the city has budgeted almost $230 million in tax-supported debt
service, including special revenue fund debt service, which equates to close to
19% of related fund spending. Together with its pension cost, the city's fixed
debt burden is considered high by Fitch.


Monthly non-farm employment figures have exhibited steady, albeit modest, growth
dating back to mid-2010. The city's unemployment rate remains elevated, however,
at 9.3% as of August 2012. Global Insight forecasts annual employment growth for
the Jacksonville metro area of 2.6% from 2013-2016 which is slightly ahead of
its U.S. and Florida employment projection. Wealth and income levels are

The Port of Jacksonville continues with major expansion projects that should
serve to boost the metro's sizable trade and transportation sectors. Growth in
the healthcare sector has helped diversify the economy, with major employers
including Baptist Health, the Mayo Clinic, and St. Vincent's Health.

The city has a sizable military presence anchored by the Jacksonville Naval Air
Station and Mayport Naval Station, which collectively employ approximately
36,000 (civilians and military). In addition, the Trident Nuclear Submarine
Base, located 35 miles north of the city in Kings Bay, Georgia, employs 9,000.
The military is estimated to contribute approximately $8 billion to the local
economy annually. Construction funding to support the Navy's plan to homeport a
nuclear fleet in Mayport has been eliminated from the federal budget proposal,
offset by some degree by the announcement Mayport would gain a group of
amphibious assault ships and 2,000 sailors between 2013 and 2016.

Additional information is available at ''. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the Tax-Supported
Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from
Creditscope, University Financial Associates, S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price
Index, IHS Global Insight,, and National Association of

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14, 2012;
--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14,

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below