January 25, 2013 / 7:21 PM / in 5 years

TEXT-Fitch affirms Edinburg, Texas GOs, COs at 'AA-'

Jan 25 - Fitch Ratings takes the following rating action on Edinburg, Texas'
(the city) general obligation (GO) bonds and certificates of obligation (COs):

--$15.6 million in outstanding general obligation (GO) refunding bonds affirmed
at 'AA-';

--$29.4 million in outstanding combination tax and revenue certificates of
obligation (COs) affirmed at 'AA-'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


The GO bonds and COs are secured by an ad valorem tax levied on all taxable
property within the city, limited to $2.50 per $100 taxable assessed valuation
(TAV). The COs are additionally secured by a subordinate lien on surplus
revenues from the city's waterworks and sewer system.


SOUND FINANCES: The city has maintained a sound financial position. Ending
balances have been strong, with some fluctuations, and have increased in recent

wealth and income indicators are below average. However, unemployment remains
below county and national levels even as the city has experienced continued
strong population growth. The city is poised to benefit from several economic
development projects currently in process, which could lead to strengthening of
the city's credit.

MIXED DEBT PROFILE: Direct debt levels are low, but increase considerably when
overlapping debt is included. Debt amortization is rapid and capital needs are
manageable, with no additional near-term GO or CO debt issuance expected.
Combined debt service, pension, and other post-employment (OPEB) costs are also


Edinburg, with an estimated 2011 population of about 79,000, is the county seat
of Hidalgo County. The city is 20 miles from the Texas-Mexico border in the Rio
Grande Valley.


The city has historically maintained strong financial reserves, with general
fund ending balances at greater than 30% of spending. General fund reserve
levels remain solid but declined in fiscal 2010 to $9.1 million or 23% of
spending (unreserved), which was below the city's policy of maintaining no less
than 25% of expenditures in fund balance. The unrestricted balance increased to
$12.9 million or about 35% of spending in fiscal 2011 and is projected remain
above 30% for fiscal 2012, using a mix of recurring and some non-recurring
transfers from other funds.

Since fiscal 2010, the city has transferred about $1.5 million annually from the
solid waste fund into the general fund as a means of bolstering revenue and
limiting the need for increased property taxes. In fiscal 2012, the city relied
on additional transfers totaling $1.6 million from other funds, primarily for
capital projects. The fiscal year 2013 budget does not include these additional
transfers, though $1.5 million is again transferred from the solid waste fund.

The fiscal 2013 budget is balanced, with the use of the solid waste fund
transfers, and year-to-date performance is positive relative to the budget.
After strong estimated fiscal 2012 revenue growth (7.7% or 4.9% excluding
interfund transfers), which includes sales(3.5% increase)and property tax
(1.7%)collection increases, the city is conservatively budgeting for a decline
in fiscal 2013 of about 5.6%, or 2% excluding transfers. Sales tax collections,
however, are stronger than budgeted and the city projects that they will exceed
budgeted amounts by about $1.2 million. Expenditure growth was 12.5% in fiscal
2012 due largely to one-time capital spending, but also to increased public
safety expenditures. Expenditures are budgeted to decline in fiscal 2013 by
about 4% reflecting much lower levels of one-time capital spending.


Because of its position near the Mexican border along a major transportation
route, Edinburg serves as a distribution center, benefiting from the trade
generated by cross-border manufacturing activity as well as the agricultural
production in the region. Retail trade, government, education and health
services are all major components of the area economy.

The city's economy has remained stable as strong population growth has offset
weak wealth and income indicators. The October 2012 unemployment rate was 7.3%,
down from 8.4% a year prior. While higher than the state's unemployment rate
(6.2%), it is below the county (10.1%) and national (7.5%) rates. Employment
levels have seen consistent annual increases through 2011. Median household
income is 77% and 74% of state and national levels, respectively. The city's
poverty rate is about 28% as compared to 17% for the state and 14% for the
nation. Further economic expansion is expected in the near term related to the
multi-phase construction of a denim manufacturing facility, expansions at a
recently completed Federal Express distribution center, and reported additional
new business development and expansions of established businesses.

Edinburg's tax base is fairly diverse, with moderate top 10 taxpayer
concentration at about 10%. Following strong prior year growth, taxable assessed
value (TAV) declined in fiscal 2011
(-1.7%), due largely to commercial inventory reductions and remained essentially
flat in fiscal 2012 (+.03%). TAV increased in fiscal 2013 (2.9%) due to stable
commercial values and increased property values.


Overall debt levels are a moderate $2,290 per capita or 5.1% of market value due
largely to local school district debt. Principal amortization of the city's
tax-supported debt is rapid with 68% repaid in ten years. City officials report
no immediate plans to issue additional tax-supported debt.

The city provides pension as well as disability and death benefits through the
Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). Funding of the pension annual required
contribution (at about 80% in fiscal year 2011) is being increased and is
expected to reach 100% in two years. The phase-in was permitted due to
retirement system restructuring in 2007. The funded level as of Dec. 31, 2010
was 70.5%, assuming a 7% investment return. In addition, the city provides OPEB
benefits to retirees up to age 65 in the form of group health insurance
coverage. Combined debt service, pension, and OPEB costs are also manageable at
about 20% of 2011 expenditures.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in Fitch's Tax-Supported
Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from
Creditscope, University Financial Associates, S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index,
IHS Global Insight, and National Association of Realtors.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012);
--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below