January 31, 2013 / 10:51 PM / in 5 years

TEXT-Fitch rates Sand Creek Metro District, Colo. GOs 'A'

Jan 31 - Fitch Ratings assigns an 'A' rating to the following Sand Creek
Metropolitan District, Colorado (the district) general obligation limited tax
(GOLT) bonds:

--$4.6 million GOLT refunding bonds, series 2013A;
--$4.7 million GOLT refunding bonds, series 2013B.

The bonds are scheduled to price the week of Feb. 4, 2013.

In addition, Fitch affirms the 'A' rating on the following bonds:

--$66.6 million outstanding GOLT bonds (pre-refunding).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


The bonds are payable from the district's property tax levy, limited to 42.5
mills, and from specific ownership taxes.


TAXPAYER CONCENTRATION: This limited purpose district has a mix of commercial,
industrial and residential space with high concentration among the top tax

LIMITED OPERATIONS; SOLID RESULTS: The operations and maintenance (O&M)
requirements of the district are modest and funded by an unlimited O&M mill levy
which Fitch considers positively. The district maintains a healthy financial

WEAK DEBT PROFILE; MINIMAL NEEDS: The debt profile is characterized by high debt
levels and slow principal amortization, balanced against limited future debt

MODERATE TAX BASE LOSSES: Recessionary pressures did impact the district's tax
base moderately but Fitch believes recent market absorption trends, notably
improved vacancy rates, and ongoing development of the multi-use district may
serve to mitigate any further material erosion of its taxable values.

ADEQUATE TAXING MARGIN: Recent assessed value (AV) losses have required
increases in the district's limited debt service mill rate but adequate margin
remains. The absence of future debt plans further aids the prospect of
sufficient debt service coverage by the district's existing resource base.


LARGE SUSTAINED TAX BASE LOSSES: Sustained and large tax base declines that lead
to significantly diminished taxing margin would likely lead to negative rating


The Sand Creek Metropolitan District is a limited purpose special district
encompassing 1,253 acres in the northeast Denver metropolitan area,
approximately 12 miles east of downtown Denver and 10 miles southwest of Denver
International Airport (DIA). The district provides financing for the
construction and installation of streets, drainage structures, street safety
controls, parks, water and sewer improvements and other infrastructure systems
needed to encourage and support the existing and future development.


The district consists of Gateway Park, a master-planned office park, which has
been in development since 1995. The mixed-use business park currently totals
about 3.8 million square feet of diverse commercial development. Represented
sectors include warehouse, distribution, and research and development facilities
(comprising about 70% of total square footage), office buildings (21%), and
retail, restaurants, and services (8%). The district also includes 15 hotels
with over 2,234 rooms and a residential area with 110 town homes and 728


The primary credit weakness is the concentrated tax base. The top 10 taxpayers
total 36% of the district's AV, down from 67% concentration in 2006. Fitch
believes such concentration is somewhat balanced against the diverse lease-hold
interests represented by 139 different tenants and stable occupancy trends.


The district's limited operating costs and high reserve levels provide it with
ample financial flexibility, aided by an unlimited O&M mill levy. Liquidity of
the district's general fund has improved notably in the last two years, now
equaling nearly one year's worth of expenditures. However, reserves remain
modest as a nominal dollar amount, totaling $1.1 million in 2011.


Proceeds of this issuance will be used to refund outstanding debt for interest
cost savings. The district's overall debt burden is a high 21% of market value,
driven by city and county of Denver debt as well as the Denver county school
district. Debt service carrying costs are very high at 85% of spending but not
unusual for limited purpose entities with minimal responsibilities. Amortization
is below average with 38% of debt retired in 10 years.

Future capital needs are minimal and no additional debt is planned. Due to
recent AV losses, the district raised its debt service millage to 29 in 2013 and
is projected to increase to a maximum of 34 mills in the event that AV remains
stagnant, leaving sufficient margin below the 42.5 mill cap. State law allows a
maximum mill rate of 50 but this would require a change to the district's
service plan by Aurora.


The maturing district is 67% developed and benefits from a favorable location
for further growth, along Interstate 70 near DIA in the City and County of
Denver (GO bonds rated 'AAA' by Fitch) and the City of Aurora. After posting
steady gains to its tax base since its inception, the district's AV declined by
a cumulative moderate 10.8% in 2011-2012, fueled by rising vacancy rates and
exacerbated by the delay or cancellation of planned projects. Although the AV
losses were not insignificant, Fitch notes that these losses compared favorably
to losses posted by surrounding metropolitan districts.


Fitch believes notably improved vacancy rates and ongoing development should
help mitigate any further tax base erosion in the next reassessment cycle in
2014. The district reports that occupancy has increased to 100% for most parcels
except office properties. The district reports 12 projects, totaling an
estimated $26 million in AV (an 18% gain), are either completed, under
construction, or permitted. These projects represent diverse sectors and are
scheduled to impact the tax rolls by 2016. Additional transit-oriented
development may also materialize in the medium term, following completion of the
Regional Transportation District's East Line (to DIA), which includes a station
within the district.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the Tax-Supported Rating
Criteria, this action was informed by information from CreditScope, University
Financial Associates, S&P/Case Schiller Home Price Index, IHS Global Insight,
Zillow.com, and National Association of Realtors.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012);
--'U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria' (Aug. 14, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
U.S. Local Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below