January 8, 2013 / 3:30 PM / 5 years ago

TEXT-Fitch rates North Carolina's limited obligation bonds 'AA+'

Jan 8 - Fitch Ratings assigns an 'AA+' rating to the following limited
obligation bonds of the State of North Carolina:

--$250 million limited obligation bonds, series 2013A.

The bonds are expected to be sold via competitive bid Jan. 15, 2013.

Fitch also affirms the 'AAA' rating on $4.5 billion of outstanding North
Carolina general obligation (GO) debt and the 'AA+' rating on $2.4 billion in
outstanding appropriation-backed debt issued by the state and its Infrastructure
Finance Corp.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


The bonds are a limited obligation of the state of North Carolina, payable
solely from state appropriation. Appropriation debt is legislatively authorized
and centrally managed, with approval required by the treasurer and council of
state, which includes all statewide elected officials. Bondholders have no lien
on or security interest in projects.


LINK TO STATE GO RATING: The 'AA+' rating on debt backed by the State of North
Carolina's appropriation commitment, one notch below the state's GO bond rating,
reflects the state's strong general credit standing, as well as the sound
structures and centralized oversight of appropriation debt.

LOW LIABILITIES: The state has a low-to-moderate debt burden and strong debt
management practices, including an affordability planning process. Over time the
state has become more reliant on appropriation debt. Pension funding is among
the strongest of the states.

WELL MANAGED FINANCIAL OPERATIONS: Financial operations are conservative with a
history of prompt action when necessary to maintain budget balance. The fiscal
2011-2013 biennial budget is meeting expectations including funding of reserves
that were utilized during the recession.

DIVERSE ECONOMY: The economy is expected to grow and diversify in the long run,
but was severely affected by the recession and recovery has been slow.



The security for the limited obligation bonds will be annual payments made by
the state, subject to legislative appropriation. The governor covenants to
include debt service payments in the budget. Appropriation debt is legislatively
authorized and approved by the council of state, comprised of all statewide
elected officials, including the treasurer, who oversees debt issuance. A
statutory debt affordability planning process encompasses appropriation debt,
and by practice the state budgets one line item for GO and appropriation debt
service. The current offering finances several capital improvements projects.

North Carolina's 'AAA' GO bond rating reflects its modest debt burden,
conservative financial operations and long-term prospects for continued economic
expansion and diversification.


Tax-supported debt approximates $8.6 billion, 40% of which is
appropriation-backed. The state's debt burden remains on the low end of the
moderate range, at 2.5% of 2011 personal income. Amortization is above average
with 70% of GO and appropriation debt due in 10 years. There is approximately
$205 million in appropriation debt authorized but unissued.

Although funding of the state's major pension system has declined, it remains
nearly fully funded at 94% as of Dec. 31, 2011. On a combined basis, the burden
of the state's net tax-supported debt and Fitch-adjusted unfunded pension
obligations as a percent of personal income is amongst the lowest of the U.S.
states rated by Fitch.


Financial operations are conservative, with the governor empowered to
unilaterally reduce spending to maintain budget balance, after making provision
for debt service. North Carolina used a variety of tools to balance its budget
over the course of the recession, including spending reductions, temporary tax
increases, use of reserves, and federal stimulus aid.

The state faced a $2.6 billion current services gap in preparing the fiscal
2011-2013 biennial budget, including the loss of $1.6 billion in federal
stimulus funds, $1.3 billion in foregone tax revenues as temporary tax increases
expired, and increased operating costs of existing programs. The consensus
revenue forecast upon which the budget was based assumed a slow recovery in
fiscal 2012 followed by more rapid growth in fiscal 2013. The state closed the
gap relying almost entirely on budget reductions and funds set aside from the
prior fiscal year.

Budget performance for fiscal 2012 met expectations with tax revenue growth
slightly higher than forecast. Tax revenues grew just 0.5% year-over-year in
fiscal 2012 but were 2.5% higher than forecast with solid growth in individual
and corporate income tax revenues offsetting lower sales tax revenues due to the
rate reduction. General fund expenditures were slightly lower than budgeted but
increased 5.8% after three years of reductions or no-growth. The revenue
forecast for fiscal 2013 was revised slightly downward as of May 2012,
projecting 4.3% growth rather than the 5.5% growth originally forecast. Tax
revenues through the first five months of fiscal 2013 are tracking the forecast,
up 4.1% year-over-year.

The solid budget performance allowed the state to add $307 million to its rainy
day fund, which had been depleted as a budget balancing solution during the
recession, bringing its balance to $419 million. Other reserves total
approximately $760 million in special and trust funds as well as approximately
$713 million in the Golden Leaf trust, funded from tobacco settlement and used
primarily for economic development in tobacco growing regions.


The transition of the economy away from manufacturing toward services continues,
with manufacturing employment now half of what it was in the 1990s. Employment
in manufacturing grew for the first time in more than 15 years in January 2011,
and has demonstrated year-over-year gains in every month but one since,
including 1.2% year-over-year growth in November 2012. Professional and business
service employment is one of the faster growing sectors, increasing 1.7% on a
year-over-year basis in November 2012. Measured by per capita personal income,
North Carolina is below average at 88% of the U.S. level, ranking 36th among the

Leading into the recession, North Carolina's economy had been growing
significantly in terms of both size and diversity; but its contraction over the
course of the recession was severe. Employment fell 5.5% during calendar year
2009, notably worse than the national decline of 4.4%, with all sectors other
than education and health services showing declines. Job losses began to abate
toward the end of 2010 but employment overall fell 0.9% in 2010, again higher
than the national decline of 0.7%.

Economic growth has been somewhat slow emerging from the recession but future
growth is expected to be stronger as the now smaller manufacturing sector begins
to recover and business and professional service sectors grow with the overall
economy. Employment growth has somewhat lagged the U.S. growth rate although it
matched the U.S. rate at 1.4% year-over-year growth in November 2012. The
state's unemployment rate of 9.1% remains higher than the national rate of 7.7%
as of November 2012, reflecting in part the need to absorb higher in-migration.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the Tax-Supported Rating
Criteria, this action was additionally informed by information from IHS Global

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14, 2012;
--'U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria', dated Aug. 14, 2012.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
U.S. State Government Tax-Supported Rating Criteria
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below