MUMBAI/BENGALURU (Reuters) - India has raised the price at which the government will buy new- season common rice variety from domestic farmers by 13 percent, said Home Minister Rajnath Singh, as the state looks to woo farmers ahead of general elections due next year.
India, one of the world’s key producers of an array of farm commodities, announces support prices for more than 20 crops each year to set a benchmark.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government said in its February budget that it would buy crops at 1.5 times the cost of production, a major shift after keeping the so-called minimum support price in low single digits over the past three years.
Analysts and economists have warned the move could help push up inflation, add to the fiscal deficit and prompt India’s central bank to raise interest rates more steeply than expected.
INDRANIL PAN, GROUP ECONOMIST, IDFC BANK, MUMBAI
“It is too early to evaluate the implication of the minimum support price (MSP) hikes on inflation. We will have to wait till October-November to see the reality in terms of markets prices vs MSP to gauge inflationary impact. The announcement of MSP increase is unlikely to change the reaction function of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) immediately, as core inflation, oil and currency will be key factors to drive the timing and extent of rate hikes. We expect the RBI to hike rates in August as well as in October due to the high core inflation and oil prices.”
FORAM PAREKH, FUNDAMENTAL ANALYST - EQUITY, INDIABULLS VENTURES, MUMBAI
“The hikes are very much in line with expectations. If the market side increases prices more than the MSPs, then it might lead to an inflationary situation. If farmers do get the benefit of the MSP hike, then the NBFC and automobile sectors would benefit due to rural income rising. Over the years, MSP has been revised by the government, but I don’t think the quoted price has reached the farmers. So it’s a wait-and-watch situation. We would only come to know if the farmers are actually getting it in the month of October.
“Due to the rise in MSPs, the government would have to bear expenses of about 330 billion rupees ($4.81 billion). It contributes not more than 0.2 pct-0.3 pct of the GDP. I think it is a very minimal number and should not impact the economy as a whole. The major dent the economy would face is from rising crude prices.”
ADITI NAYAR, PRINCIPAL ECONOMIST, ICRA LTD, MUMBAI
“Without further details on whether the procurement of crops would be widened from the current set, or if another mechanism would be adopted to ensure that farmers receive prices at par with MSPs for their produce, it remains difficult to ascertain the impact of higher MSPs on inflation and fiscal deficit.
“Some of the items that have seen the biggest increases in MSPs for the ongoing kharif season, such as jowar, bajra, ragi and moong, have a small weight in the WPI and CPI indices. This may help to contain the inflationary impact, if higher MSPs translate to higher market prices.
“Nevertheless, it is difficult to envision a scenario in which the recently announced hike in MSPs actually translates into higher realizations for farmers, without an increase in prices for the end-consumers or costs for the central and state governments through higher procurement costs and subsidy bill.”
UPASNA BHARDWAJ, SENIOR ECONOMIST, KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK, MUMBAI
“Most of the wholesale prices are higher than the mininum support price. How that translates into market prices will be a function of how exactly the implementation of these MSPs would be. At this point, it is difficult to gauge exact impact on inflation. It seems to be inflationary, but magnitude is uncertain. This move was something that was necessary, but needs to be implemented in the right way to ensure they get what they need, to be able to cover up for the costs.”
TIRTHANKAR PATNAIK, INDIA STRATEGIST, MIZUHO BANK, MUMBAI
“The 200 rupees per quintal hike for paddy is very reasonable, so not likely to rattle markets. If the number was anything beyond 200 rupees, there could have been some market implication. The hike will add about a 25 basis point number to headline inflation, which the government would be okay with. I think this hike should not have too much of a negative impact.
“The hike in ragi crop was higher than expected. A larger hike in paddy would have moved the needle. So, this is a negative, but not an unexpected negative from a fiscal balance perspective. It is quite clear it was a question between keeping the farmer community happy in the pre-election year and also not to upset the credit rating agencies. With this hike for paddy, they have ensured the tightrope balance is fine.
“We may see these populist measures coming from the state governments instead of federal government. I’ll not be surprised if we see similar sops from the state government simply because the current GST collection, crude at over $70 does not leave much room for fiscal balancing by the central government.”
SHUBHADA RAO, CHIEF ECONOMIST, YES BANK, MUMBAI
“The median hike from the MSPs is 25 percent compared with 3-4 percent in the last three years. The impact from these MSP hikes will be 35 basis points to headline inflation in the current fiscal year, and another 35 bps in the next. The MSP hike is broadly along expected lines, and may not accentuate concerns for the RBI on this account.
“However, a larger concern emanates from continued elevated prices of crude oil. We maintain a risk of one more hike of 25 bps by October. We don’t see any material risk on fiscal as the impact is at a manageable level of 0.1 percent of GDP. In every preceding election year, the MSP hikes have been high, like it was 40 percent in 2009, 27 percent in 2013 and 25 percent in 2018. This will help in boosting farmer income and potentially offset the adverse impact of high oil prices on growth.”
A PRASANNA, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ICICI SECURITIES PRIMARY DEALERSHIP LTD, MUMBAI
“The newly announced minimum support prices for Kharif crops mark a steep rise in prices. We estimate that the rise in support prices of cereals and pulses in FY 2019 will be nearly 25 percent, equivalent to the cumulative increase seen over the last five years. On a CPI-weighted basis, the increase amounts to 90 basis points, and thus, we expect at least 50 bps upside risk to forward-looking inflation estimate. Should the government rely on large-scale procurement of crops to implement the prices, then the fiscal cost could be around 0.3 percent of GDP, which might be shared by the central and state governments.
“As far as monetary policy is concerned, we expect the Monetary Policy Committee to take note of the upside risk due to direct impact of higher MSPs, fiscal cost and second-round effects. In tandem with further rise in oil prices and rupee depreciation since the June policy, this development should cement the case for another hike. We continue to expect that hike to be delivered in the October meeting.”
($1 = 68.6200 Indian rupees)
Reporting by Suvashree Dey Choudhury and Abhirup Roy in Mumbai; Tanvi Mehta, Krishna V Kurup and Jessica Kuruthukulangara in Bengaluru, Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.