(Reuters) - British shopping center operator Hammerson HMSO.L is pulling out of buying smaller rival Intu Properties INTUP.L by asking its increasingly skeptical shareholders not to back the planned 3.4 billion pound ($4.8 billion) deal.
The owner of Birmingham’s Bullring and London’s Brent Cross said on Wednesday its board had withdrawn its recommendation that shareholders support the all-share takeover due to heightened concerns about the British retail sector.
Hammerson’s announcement lifted its shares by 4.2 percent to 514.2 pence, but knocked Intu’s down 4.1 percent.
Shareholders had become concerned the deal would increase Hammerson’s exposure to the British retail sector, which has been hit by weak consumer demand.
French rival Klepierre LOIM.PA added to the uncertainty facing the takeover by bidding last month for Hammerson, which also owns Bristol's Cabot Circus and a stake in the Bicester Village retail outlet.
Paris-based Klepierre made its approach after Hammerson’s shares slumped in the months following the announcement of the Intu deal in December. It wanted to buy Hammerson without Intu.
Klepierre raised its offer to 5 billion pounds ($7.15 billion) last week but then abandoned it on Friday, saying Hammerson had not provided “meaningful engagement”.
Hammerson’s U-turn on the Intu deal comes after several retailers and restaurants, including electronics business Maplin and burger chain Byron, either fell into administration or were forced to agree restructuring plans with their creditors in recent months.
“Whilst Hammerson has proven its portfolio is well positioned to weather the current environment, the equity market now perceives a heightened level of risk associated with the UK retail property sector as a whole,” it said in a statement.
But Intu described the explanations given by Hammerson for withdrawing its recommendation as “unsatisfactory” and sought to reassure investors about its prospects.
David Fischel, Intu’s chief executive, said the group was “confident of our future”, adding: “We’ve got a very high quality business.”
Hammerson Chairman David Tyler told Reuters that its shareholders had been “very supportive” of its decision.
“I’m not considering stepping down and the board has 100 percent confidence in David Atkins as chief executive and his senior management team,” he said.
LINE IN SAND
Concern over the Intu deal has grown since Hammerson spurned Klepierre’s approach. On the same day that Klepierre walked away, Dutch pension fund APG, one of Hammerson’s biggest shareholders, said it would oppose the Intu takeover.
APG said on Wednesday that it was “very pleased” with the Hammerson board’s change of stance. J O Hambro Capital Management, a top 20 Hammerson investor, praised the board “for taking the difficult decision”.
Another top 10 investor told Reuters that Klepierre’s second, 635 pence-per-share bid rejected by Hammerson had now drawn a line in the sand for the British company’s management to match or better, by finding other ways to boost value for shareholders.
Under British rules Klepierre cannot revive its approach for at least six months, unless Hammerson invites it back sooner, another suitor makes a bid, or there is a material change.
But Tyler said it was “exceedingly unlikely” that Hammerson would open the door to the French firm.
“Their ability to pay the sort of price that we think shareholders would be interested in is very constrained if you look at the Klepierre balance sheet,” he said.
For the Intu takeover to proceed, shareholders in both companies must vote on it at separate meetings. However, Hammerson said it would not hold its investor meeting if Intu and Britain’s Takeover Panel agree.
The withdrawal of the board recommendation alone will not cause Hammerson’s offer to lapse and Intu said its board will convene to consider Hammerson’s request to abandon a vote.
Hammerson said it was confident of its prospects as a standalone business and was reviewing options including selling sites, investing in its premium outlets, and returning cash to shareholders.
“Hammerson, on a standalone basis, should be in a stronger position to allocate capital to its faster growing markets, such as premium outlets,” analysts at Liberum said.
Reporting by Arathy S Nair in Bengaluru and Ben Martin in London; editing by Jason Neely and Alexander Smith
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.