(Adds comments from J.C. Penney, plaintiffs’ lawyer)
By Jonathan Stempel
May 19 (Reuters) - A federal judge certified a class-action lawsuit that accuses J.C. Penney Company Inc of marking up retail prices on apparel and accessories to trick shoppers into believing they were getting big discounts when the items were advertised on sale.
In a decision on Monday, U.S. District Judge Fernando Olguin in Los Angeles said it was possible “in one stroke” to determine whether J.C. Penney’s advertising practices caused shoppers in California to buy items at discounts that proved illusory.
The complaint accused the company of running a “massive, years-long, pervasive campaign” to deceive shoppers about its pricing for private-label brands, and for outside brands such as Liz Claiborne, sold exclusively by the retailer.
Lead plaintiff Cynthia Spann said she discovered this after buying three blouses for $17.99 each, a 40 percent discount from the “original” $30 price, only to learn the price was never above $17.99 in the prior three months.
By letting shoppers sue as a group, the decision could help them obtain greater compensation at lower cost from the Plano, Texas-based retailer than if they sued individually.
“We’re thrilled with the decision,” said Matthew Zevin, a lawyer for the plaintiff class, which he said could number hundreds of thousands. “Price comparisons are not illegal, but it is deceptive if there is no basis for the original price.”
J.C. Penney spokeswoman Kate Coultas said the retailer does not discuss pending litigation.
Similar lawsuits have been filed against retailers such as Kohls Corp and Men’s Wearhouse Inc’s Jos. A. Bank unit.
Olguin certified a class of plaintiffs who bought private-label or exclusive items from J.C. Penney in California from Nov. 5, 2010 to Jan. 31, 2012 at discounts of 30 percent or more. These shoppers accused the retailer of violating state consumer protection laws.
The Federal Trade Commission has said retailers are supposed to sell items at original prices for a “reasonable length of time” before marking them down if they wish later to provide the original prices to consumers who compare prices.
J.C. Penney moved away from discounts in 2012, when Chief Executive Officer Ron Johnson adopted a strategy of “fair and square” everyday low pricing.
It resumed discounting after sales plunged, a decline that contributed to Johnson’s ouster the following year.
The case is Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 12-00215. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe and Alan Crosby)