NEW YORK (Reuters) - Argentina’s central bank on Monday won the reversal of a U.S. court ruling that had allowed bondholders to try to hold it responsible for the country’s obligations on debt that has been in default since 2002.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York overturned a 2013 ruling denying a bid by Banco Central de la República Argentina (BCRA) to dismiss claims by U.S. investment firms holding $2.4 billion in judgments against the South American country.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa had previously held that the central bank had waived its sovereign immunity, and that as a result, the hedge funds could move forward with a lawsuit targeting the bank’s assets.
Argentina is lobbying internationally for tighter controls on the activities of junk debt specialists, which President Cristina Fernandez’s leftist government brands “vultures.”
The ruling “sets an international precedent and guarantees that vulture funds will not be allowed to seize the reserves of the central bank,” bank President Alejandro Vanoli said in a statement.
“Once again, as Argentina has often expressed, Judge Griesa’s absurd decisions are without judicial grounds,” the economy ministry said in a separate statement.
Argentine bonds traded over-the-counter recovered early-session losses after the ruling.
The ruling had been sought by bondholders, including NML Capital Ltd, which is a unit of Paul Singer’s Elliott Management Corp, and EM Ltd, controlled by investor Kenneth Dart, who sought to go after funds BCRA held in foreign jurisdictions.
But the three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit reversed, saying BCRA could invoke its own sovereign immunity to avoid liability. It directed Griesa to dismiss the case.
Circuit Judge Jose Cabranes wrote that the court’s ruling is not intended to allow Argentina to “continue shirking the debts it has the ability to pay, although we suspect that this will be a predictable and unfortunate outcome of our decision.”
Cabranes said, however, that the central bank was entitled to invoke its own sovereign immunity as a defence.
A representative for NML Capital declined to comment. Representatives for EM Ltd did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling stemmed from long-running litigation by creditors seeking full repayment on bonds after Argentina’s $100 billion default in 2002.
Those creditors spurned Argentina’s 2005 and 2010 debt restructurings, which resulted in 93 percent of its defaulted debt being swapped and investors being paid less than 30 cents on the dollar.
The country defaulted again in July 2014 after refusing to settle with the so-called holdout creditors.
Additional reporting by Richard Lough in Buenos Aires; Editing by Dan Grebler and Cynthia Osterman