LONDON (Reuters) - British lawmakers wrested control of the Brexit process from the government on Wednesday in order to try to find a majority for an alternative way forward that could break the parliamentary deadlock over Prime Minister Theresa May’s proposed deal.
They will hold so-called indicative votes on a variety of possible Brexit outcomes.
Below is how the process will work:
Speaker John Bercow has selected eight Brexit options to be put to a vote, from a list of 16 proposals put forward by lawmakers. They are:
B) No deal - proposer John Baron
Leave the EU on April 12 without a deal.
D) Common Market 2.0 - Nick Boles
An enhanced Norway-style deal which would include membership of the EU’s single market as well as a customs arrangement with the EU.
H) EFTA and EEA - George Eustice
Remain a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) and reapply to join the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).
J) Customs union - Kenneth Clarke
A Brexit deal which must include, as a minimum, a commitment to negotiate a permanent and comprehensive UK-wide customs Union with the EU.
K) Labour’s alternative plan - Jeremy Corbyn
Opposition Labour Party plan for a close economic relationship with the EU including a comprehensive customs union and close alignment with the Single Market.
L) Revocation to avoid no deal - Joanna Cherry
Revoking Article 50 if parliament does not consent to leaving without a deal.
M) Confirmatory public vote - Margaret Beckett
Confirmatory referendum to approve Brexit deal before it is ratified by parliament
O) Contingent preferential arrangements - Marcus Fysh
A managed ‘no-deal’ process in the event an exit agreement with the EU is not reached.
(For details of each: here)
The options selected by the Speaker will be printed on a green ballot paper and lawmakers will be asked to vote “aye” or “no” to each of them. They will be able to vote for as many of the proposals as they wish.
Conservative lawmaker Oliver Letwin, who led the process to seize control from the government, told parliament on Monday that lawmakers would have to be willing to support more than one option in order to find a majority.
“We will all have to seek compromise. We almost know that if we all vote for our first preference, we will never get to a majority solution,” he said. “I do not believe there is a majority in favour of the first preferences of any person in this House.”
The debate is due to end at 1900 GMT and lawmakers will then be given 30 minutes to record their votes.
The Speaker said he would announce the results as soon as they were ready but this would not be before parliament has finished debating secondary legislation on changing the date of Brexit in law. That is due to run until 2100 GMT.
The result could show no majority for any option, a majority for several options or even a majority for all options.
Letwin told parliament he viewed Wednesday’s votes as the first stage in a process. Lawmakers will take control of parliamentary business again on Monday, April 1 when they will likely vote on a further narrowed-down list of options.
The votes are not binding on the government.
May said on Monday she could not commit the government to delivering the outcome of any votes held, as parliament might vote for something which was not negotiable with the EU, or which contradicted her party’s 2017 election promises.
Letwin said that if parliament succeeded in finding a majority for a way forward, he hoped the government would accept that outcome but if it did not, then lawmakers would bring forward legislation seeking to force it to do so.
Yes. In 2003, lawmakers were given seven different options for proposed reform of parliament’s unelected upper chamber, the House of Lords, but no options garnered a majority.
Additional reporting by Elizabeth Piper; editing by Stephen Addison