BEIJING (Reuters) - At the heart of the conflict over Tibet’s status within China is the historical relationship.
The Chinese government and Tibet’s government-in-exile offer competing versions of whether the remote, mountainous territory was historically ruled as part of China, or whether it has legitimate claims to independence or autonomy.
Following are some details about the history of relations.
THE IMPERIAL ERA
- Most historians say Tibet was assimilated into the Mongol empire during the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368) which also covered large parts of present day China and which Beijing claims established its sovereign claim over Tibet.
- But the nature of the relationship varied over the centuries depending on the relative strength or weakness of China’s imperial government. The Qing dynasty (1644-1911) emperors were especially weak toward the end of their reign, when British and other foreign forces began making inroads.
THE REPUBLICAN ERA
- The 13th Dalai Lama expelled Chinese troops stationed in Lhasa in the chaos after the fall of the Qing dynasty in 1911. He declared independence in 1912 and Tibet largely ruled itself until 1950, when China struggled with foreign invasion and civil war.
- But China’s Republican government maintained its claim to Tibet.
- In support of Tibet’s claim to independence during this period, scholars note it had its own foreign affairs bureau, remained neutral during World War Two and issued passports.
- But neither China nor any major Western power recognized it as independent and China’s government refused to accept the border between British India and Tibet drawn up at the 1913-14 Simla Conference.
- The current Dalai Lama -- the 14th -- was discovered in 1937 as a two-year-old in a village in Amdo, now a part of China’s western province of Qinghai.
THE COMMUNIST ERA
- China says it sent People’s Liberation Army troops to Tibet in 1950 to liberate Tibetan “serfs” and after local leaders refused to negotiate the region’s “peaceful liberation.”
- Under the 17-point Agreement of 1951, China pledged to keep Tibet’s traditional government and religion in place. But Communist land reform and collectivization left the region in turmoil, and in 1959 the Dalai Lama led an uprising against Chinese rule, despite his initial support for the 1951 accord.
- In 1979, the Dalai Lama, who had by then established a government-in-exile in India, abandoned claims of independence in favor of a “Middle Way” approach advocating political autonomy for Tibet under Beijing’s rule. Beijing dismisses the “Middle Way” as a sham and says the Dalai Lama has not truly abandoned independence.
- Chinese government officials and representatives of the Dalai Lama have held secretive talks on the Tibet question intermittently since 1979. The last round in November finished with both sides blaming each other for a lack of progress.
- In March 2008, frustrations over Chinese rule saw monk-led protests in Lhasa give way to violent anti-Chinese riots that killed 19 people and triggered unrest in other ethnically Tibetan areas of neighboring provinces.
- The Dalai Lama ruled out retiring at a six-day conclave in Dharamsala in northern India in November where exiled Tibetans reaffirmed his “Middle Way” approach.
Sources: “The Tibet-China Conflict: History and Polemics” by Elliot Sperling; “Tibet -- Its Ownership and Human Rights Situation, by China’s State Council; “Modern China: A Companion to a Rising Power” by Graham Hutchings.
Compiled by Ian Ransom; Editing by Nick Macfie
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.