CHICAGO (Reuters) - A job and a paycheck - they go together like coffee and cream. But when you retire from your regular job, does that mean you have to give up the cream?
A growing number of 401(k) plans are including investment choices that can help savers convert nest eggs into retirement income. Participants can buy insurance annuities or other products designed to spread funds over a lifetime.
These programs aim to make 401(k)s more like traditional pensions. That’s laudable if it helps retirees cope with “longevity risk” - that is, the risk of exhausting savings in a retirement of unpredictable length.
But the new retirement income initiatives have disadvantages too, so savers should proceed carefully. Here are some points to consider if one of them shows up in a 401(k) plan near you.
Insurance companies are salivating at the opportunity to sell annuities into 401(k) plans. They want a piece of the $5.1 trillion in assets that the Investment Company Institute says was in workplace retirement plans last year.
The latest example: Prudential Retirement recently announced plans to distribute its variable annuity, called IncomeFlex, to more than 3,000 workplace 401(k) plans administered by Wells Fargo & Co. Prudential already markets IncomeFlex - which has a guaranteed minimum withdrawal feature - through several other large plan administrators and those plans it runs.
Currently, only 16 percent of employers offer in-plan annuities, according to a Metlife survey. Employers worry about the complexity of administering an annuity option and the fiduciary responsibility of picking an insurance company, since retirees would need to rely on that underwriter to make payments for decades to come.
The industry is pushing two annuity types for the workplace market - fixed and variable. A fixed annuity allows you to purchase a specified amount of guaranteed income for life, with the payments determined by the amount you invest, prevailing interest rates at the time of purchase (higher is better) and when you want to start receiving the income. The payout on a variable annuity can vary, depending on the earnings of the investments within the annuity.
Either option can be immediate, meaning you don’t buy it until you’re ready to collect the income stream, or deferred, meaning that you buy it years in advance and let it grow before you tap it.
A popular type of variable annuity for retirement plans is the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit annuity, or GMWB, like Prudential‘s. Here, you invest in a portfolio of stocks and bonds for 10 years prior to retirement; the initial withdrawal amount is linked to the amount in the account. Payments can rise in subsequent years if the portfolio investments beat certain pre-agreed benchmarks.
The advantage over other annuities is the guarantee: if you die before the assets have been used up, your heirs get what’s left. Other annuities, in contrast, require you to surrender control of the invested funds when you start taking payouts, though they tend to offer higher payoffs.
A $100,000 investment in a GMWB might yield annual retirement income of $5,000 for someone retiring at 65, according to calculations from Josh Cohen, defined contribution practice leader at Russell Investments. If the portfolio performs really well, the annual income amount could rise to $5,750 at age 85, but the odds of that aren’t good, Cohen says.
The same investment in a fixed deferred annuity would get the retiree $6,360 in annual income. Or, he could take a bit less initial income ($4,836) but get a 2.5 percent annual inflation adjustment that would spin off $7,900 annually at age 85.
Some companies are offering another option: A pre-set portfolio designed to generate income for the long haul. For example, Financial Engines, which works with workplace plans, has a product called Income+ that splits a retiree’s account into buckets for bonds, stocks and cash that can be used to buy a deferred annuity that kicks in at age 85.
GMWBs “can be mind-numbingly complex to understand, and it’s difficult to figure out what they really cost,” says David Blanchett, head of retirement research at Morningstar. They can be pricey, but those tucked inside 401(k)s benefit from lower institutional pricing. Prudential, for example, says its IncomeFlex GMWB costs $1,500 per year for every $100,000 invested.
Blanchett worries that putting annuities in 401(k)s could prompt some workers to purchase them prematurely. Because of the annual insurance costs, it only makes sense for older workers within a decade or so of retirement to jump in.
Even insurance sellers caution retirees not to annuitize all of their savings, so there are liquid assets left for large and unexpected expenses.
(The writer is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)
Follow us @ReutersMoney or here. Editing by Linda Stern