September 28, 2012 / 12:04 AM / 7 years ago

US Treasury's Geithner urges action on money market funds

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner called on Thursday for the new U.S. financial risk council to consider reforms for money market funds, despite stiff opposition from the $2.6 trillion industry and from some securities regulators.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks during a panel discussion hosted by the Los Angeles World Affairs Council titled "The U.S. and World Economies: An Overview" in Los Angeles, California July 31, 2012. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

In a letter released by the Treasury Department, Geithner said the Financial Stability Oversight Council should formally ask the Securities and Exchange Commission to move forward with new rules in a bid to get the divided SEC to act.

He also said the council and its member regulators should consider exercising other powers to regulate the money market fund industry more tightly, including naming some firms as “systemic” and imposing capital surcharges on banks that sponsor money funds.

“Without further reform of money market funds, our financial system will remain vulnerable to runs and instability, which are harmful for retail and institutional investors,” Geithner wrote.

“With the failure of the SEC to act, the Council should now move forward with the tools provided by Congress.”

Geithner’s letter came about a month after Mary Schapiro, the head of the SEC, announced that she had failed to win enough support at her agency to advance reforms.

Schapiro had circulated a draft proposal on fund reforms that included requiring the funds to build up capital buffers and impose limits on redemptions to reduce the risk of runs on funds.

It also included a plan to move away from funds’ policy of maintaining a stable $1 per share net asset value.

But three of the SEC’s commissioners - Democrat Luis Aguilar and Republicans Troy Paredes and Dan Gallagher - said they could not support her proposals.

They have expressed skepticism about the need to adopt additional money market reforms beyond the ones enacted in 2010.

Aguilar declined to comment on Geithner’s letter, while Paredes and Gallagher did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Beyond disagreements at the SEC, the fund industry and corporate treasurers have also come out in full force to oppose Schapiro’s proposals.

One fear among fund executives is that the proposals would drive investors out of money funds and into bank accounts.

Fidelity Investments, for instance, has warned regulators that more than half of its money-fund clients would move a portion of their assets if a floating net asset value rule prevailed.

The Chamber of Commerce has also weighed in, saying it could harm businesses that rely on the funds for short-term funding. Earlier this year, the Chamber launched an ad campaign at the metro stop near the SEC’s main offices used by many SEC staffers on their commutes.

On Thursday, the Chamber raised concerns about Geithner’s intentions to have FSOC get involved.

“The SEC, which is best suited to address this issue, should go back to the drawing board and, only after careful analysis, consider alternatives that will strengthen rather than destroy money market funds that serve the needs of millions of investors and companies,” said Alice Joe, the executive director of the Chamber’s Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness.

“The broad coalition of businesses, cities, states and others that opposed Chairman Schapiro’s harmful reforms will no doubt oppose the same reforms pushed by the Treasury secretary,” she added.

The Investment Company Institute President Paul Schott Stevens said the reform proposals Geithner presented to the financial risk council already had drawn strong opposition “for their adverse impacts on investors, issuers and the economy.”

“Opponents include hundreds of organizations across the nation as well as members of Congress from both parties,” Stevens said in a statement emailed to Reuters. He said the ICI, the national association of U.S. investment companies, hoped regulators would take “an objective fact-based view” of the issues involved.

Confidence in the money fund industry was shaken in 2008 when the Reserve Primary Fund, one of the oldest and biggest money funds, “broke the buck,” meaning its per-share value fell below $1. That happened because of the fund’s heavy losses on debt holdings in investment bank Lehman Brothers, which had collapsed a few days earlier.

The SEC enacted money market reforms in 2010 that tightened credit quality standards, shortened weighted average maturities and imposed a liquidity requirement on money market funds.

But Schapiro is not convinced those rules go far enough.

Last week, Schapiro penned a column in the Wall Street Journal calling on the FSOC to take action, saying money market funds remain vulnerable to runs.

The FSOC is slated to meet in a closed-door session on Friday, where the topic of money market funds may come up.

Geithner’s decision to get FSOC involved in money market funds will ratchet up the pressure on SEC commissioners to come to a consensus.

Created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law in 2010, the FSOC is a panel comprised of the top U.S. banking and financial market regulators.

The council has the authority to dub non-bank financial firms such as money market funds “systemically important,” a designation that subjects them to greater regulatory oversight.

The panel can also use its powers to pressure regulators to act, in a Dodd-Frank measure colloquially known as the “name and shame” provision.

That provision allows the FSOC to make formal recommendations to regulators. The SEC would then need either to adopt the FSOC’s proposed rules or formally reject them in writing within 90 days.

In his letter, Geithner urged the council to consider both of these options.

He said he has already asked his staff to begin drafting a list of formal recommendations for the SEC to consider. He said he wants the council to consider the recommendations at its November meeting.

Some of those reforms, he said, could include Schapiro’s proposals to require funds to set aside more capital and restrict customer withdrawals at times of stress.

He also, however, said the council is willing to entertain an alternative approach of imposing capital standards coupled with liquidity fees or temporary “gates” on redemptions.

Both Republican SEC commissioners last month said they were open to exploring rules that would allow fund boards to impose “gates” on redemptions.

In a statement, SEC spokesman John Nester said that Schapiro is “pleased that this important reform initiative is moving forward.”

Reporting by Karey Wutkowski and Sarah N. Lynch; Editing by Neil Stempleman and Dan Grebler

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below