Analysis: Peru leader's $11.5 billion gas project faces snags

LIMA (Reuters) - Peru has abundant natural gas reserves, but President Ollanta Humala’s $11.5 billion plan to use them to transform the country’s underdeveloped south is facing mounting hurdles.

A view shows the Las Malvinas natural gas plant of the Camisea project in the Amazon jungle in Cuzco, in this April 3, 2012 file picture. REUTERS/Enrique Castro-Mendivil

The U.S. shale gas revolution, left-wing guerrillas who operate near Peru’s gas fields in the jungle, and difficult negotiations with energy firms have dragged the expected finish line for Humala’s flagship project far past his 2016 term limit.

The delays underscore the risks of making natural gas plans, especially in an emerging era dominated by cheap U.S. shale reserves, causing some investors to reevaluate projects in Peru.

Humala wants to diversify Peru’s fast-growing economy with what would be the first plastics plants along the Pacific coast of South America while generating power for new mines and providing Peruvians with cheap fuel.

The plan calls for a $4 billion natural gas pipeline, a $3.5 billion petrochemicals factory and $4 billion in power plants that would rely on Peru’s main gas fields, known as Camisea, which have nearly 13 trillion cubic feet of proven reserves.

But two years into his term, no parts of the plan have gone past the design phase. Concessions have yet to be auctioned for the 1,000-km (620-mile) pipeline and power plants, while tough negotiations over ethane supplies for the petrochemicals complex have barely started.

Committed investors are impatient.

"It is not enough to talk about it. Action must be taken," said Sergio Thiesen, the regional head of Brazilian petrochemicals giant Braskem BRKM5.SA, which would build the $3.5 billion factory as part of the plastics hub. "Peru has a unique opportunity because it has the resources and the demand."

(Graphic on projects:

Critics say the project’s design is driven by a desire to appeal to voters in Peru’s poorer south and that it would be cheaper to build the petrochemicals hub at the terminus of the country’s sole existing gas pipeline on the coast near Lima.

Humala, who has said he would like to be remembered for the project, likely will not be able to reap political benefits from its completion before he leaves office.

“There is no way this project will be ready in 2016 - any one of the components takes five years to build,” said a high-ranking official deeply involved in Peru’s energy sector.

“This is about politics. It doesn’t make technical sense: it’s not well-designed, it’s incoherent, and will cost twice as much as necessary,” said the official, who declined to be identified.

Industry experts say the first petrochemical plant - which would produce 1.2 million tonnes of polyethylene a year for sale in Chile, Peru and Colombia - cannot open until 2018.


Humala has acknowledged the difficulties the project faces, especially surrounding the pipeline - a crucial initial step that will guarantee gas needed by other investments.

“We have put our blood, sweat and tears into developing the financial framework (for the pipeline),” he said recently.

The government says a handful of firms will likely compete for the right to build the pipeline in a pending auction.

“We are seeing a lot of enthusiasm among firms interested in bidding,” Mines and Energy Minister Jorge Merino said.

Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht intends to bid on the pipeline. The firm’s earlier plan to build a similar channel was scrapped because of financing issues.

Company head Marcelo Odebrecht said critics of the ambitious project should take a broader view.

“This project as a whole is the biggest and most complete in Latin America today. We are not just talking about a pipeline, we are talking about an integral development project,” he said.

Humala says the pipeline will help boost energy security in Peru by moving gas from Camisea in the southern Cusco region to the coastal area of Moquegua, where it will power a new node of plants with 2,000 megawatts of capacity.

Peru currently has effective capacity of some 6,500 MW with a fairly thin surplus of 13 percent. The government says the node would provide backup power if existing thermoelectric plants near Lima, which produce half of Peru’s electricity, fail during disasters such as earthquakes.

The pipeline would also bring ethane to the plastics plant due to be built by Braskem, a unit of Odebrecht that would partner with Peru’s state-owned oil firm Petroperu.

Braskem says work on the pipeline must start before it can begin constructing its plant - and there are also doubts about ethane supplies it needs.

Humala’s government has passed a law requiring Petroperu to negotiate an ethane supply contract for Braskem.

But there are no regulations requiring the consortium that operates the Camisea fields, led by Argentina’s Pluspetrol, to extract ethane from gas and sell it to Braskem, according to former mines and energy minister Carlos Herrera.

Experience suggests the talks could drag on.

Negotiations that started three years ago between the government and the consortium over royalties continue today, and talks over how much gas should be set aside for domestic use lasted two years.

“Petroperu needs to be willing to handle this and do it quickly,” Braskem’s Thiesen said.


Remnants of the Shining Path insurgency also pose dangers.

The armed group traffics cocaine and coca in swaths of jungle that surround Peru’s principal gas deposits - the Camisea fields where the new pipeline would originate.

Security problems have already snarled operations on the existing gas pipeline that runs from Camisea to near Lima, prompting Humala to reinforce army deployments in the area.

A rupture on the existing pipeline would temporarily knock out half of all Peruvian electrical generation until existing power plants were switched to diesel from gas.

External forces could also hobble Humala’s plan.

Two petrochemical projects that were planned for Peru as far back as 2008, but which were not part of Humala’s package, have been thrown into limbo since the U.S. shale gas revolution.

Prices for gas at Henry Hub, a U.S. benchmark, have fallen by more than half over the last five years. They are around $3.80 per million British thermal units now but were below $2 in April 2012. Gas in Peru is around $3.20 per mmBtu.

A $2 billion Peruvian nitrates plant planned by U.S.-based CF Industries was put on hold partly because prices tumbled in the United States, Herrera said. The company did not comment.

A nitrates project of Peru's Grupo Brescia and Chile's Sigdo Koppers SK.SN for $1 billion has also been held up.

Geir Skarstein, head of the joint project, said the owners want to move forward though they do not yet have a supply contract that defines a long-term price.

“For a project this big, we have to make sure we can compete with the United States,” he said. “With shale gas now you have to find just the right formula.”

Additional reporting by Marco Aquino; Editing by Terry Wade and Dale Hudson