WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Energy Department did its homework on a $535 million loan guarantee it gave to now-bankrupt solar panel maker Solyndra, Energy Secretary Steven Chu plans to tell lawmakers at a hearing on Thursday.
Republicans are expected to grill Chu on taxpayer-funded aid to Solyndra, brandishing e-mails from government officials and investors that they say show the loan was rushed, poorly supervised and ill-advisedly restructured.
Excerpts of Chu’s prepared statements for the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce committee show he plans to stand firm on the Obama administration’s strategy of investing in clean energy.
“The loan guarantee to Solyndra was subject to proper, rigorous scrutiny and healthy debate during every phase of the process,” according to excerpts released by Chu’s department.
“When it comes to the clean energy race, America faces a simple choice: compete or accept defeat. I believe we can and must compete,” Chu said in his remarks, urging Congress to continue to finance renewable energy projects.
Investigators have gathered more than 250,000 pages of documents about Solyndra and conducted hours of interviews over the past nine months. Chu is the most senior government official to appear before the panel.
Democratic lawmakers plan to knock down the Republican arguments, according to a staff memo released on Wednesday that includes a third-party legal opinion confirming the loan restructuring was permissible.
The opinion was prepared by Mary Anne Sullivan of the law firm Hogan Lovells, who was the Energy Department’s general counsel during the Clinton administration.
Lawmakers have complained Solyndra talked of rosy financial forecasts just before it ran out of cash. The FBI raided Solyndra after it filed for bankruptcy, although little is known about that probe.
Last week, the Energy Department gave lawmakers a copy of a letter from a supplier who said Solyndra had sought to postpone payments to show “a higher-than-actual cash position to the U.S. government,” according to the Democratic staff memo.
The memo did not include a copy of the letter but Democrats said “questions may be raised” whether the Energy Department responded appropriately.
E-mails provided to Reuters show a loan program official referred the fraud complaint to Solyndra lawyer Ben Schwartz in March 2010, asking him to “just send us whatever you have from your end, and we’ll put it in the file ... No further action required.”
The department official did not follow up on that request for seven months, until the company was running out of cash and sought to restructure its loan, e-mails showed.
“I don’t mean to be a pest but can you send us an e-mail indicating the result of your internal investigation of whether subsequent to Nov 2009, Solyndra withheld payment to suppliers to improve its cash position,” the loan official asked.
Schwartz replied with a memo dated November 4, 2010, saying Solyndra officials found no evidence to support the complaint. Schwartz argued that even if the allegations were true, “such actions would not constitute fraudulent activity.”
Republicans have raised questions about whether decisions were made to help George Kaiser, a major investor in Solyndra and a fundraiser for successful presidential election campaign of Barack Obama, a Democrat, in 2008.
“No decision we made in the loan program had anything to do with who is investing in this company,” Chu told National Public Radio in an interview that aired on Tuesday night.
Democratic lawmakers said key department officials were unaware of Kaiser’s connections and noted David Frantz, the director of the loan program, told investigators he had never heard of Kaiser until media reports about Solyndra.
When Solyndra struggled with cash flow in October 2010 and Goldman Sachs failed to find new private funding to keep it going, Kaiser’s advisers were unsure whether plowing in more money was a good idea, e-mails provided by Republicans showed.
Solyndra wanted to announce some layoffs on October 28, 2010, but postponed the bad news until after the November 2 midterm elections, according to e-mails from Argonaut Private Equity, which manages Kaiser’s investments.
“The DOE has requested a delay until after the election (without mentioning the election),” unidentified Argonaut officials wrote in one of three e-mails about the delay.
A Department of Energy spokesman dismissed the allegation, saying documents it provided show “decisions about this loan were made on the merits.”
In December 2010, the department suggested a restructuring plan that saw $75 million from Argonaut and another private investors ranked ahead of the government in the event of bankruptcy, the new e-mails showed.
“I struggle to recommend making the additional investment,” Steve Mitchell, managing director of Argonaut, wrote to Kaiser, noting the deal would give Solyndra some time to see if it could improve sagging sales.
Editing by John O'Callaghan