BlackRock pitches for shareholder protection as Asia bourses weigh dual-class listings

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Hong Kong and Singapore bourses need to introduce shareholder protection measures if they allow companies with dual-classes of shares to list, BlackRock Inc's BLK.N head of investment stewardship for Asia Pacific said on Tuesday.

FILE PHOTO: Pru Bennett, Blackrock's head of corporate governance and responsible investment for Asia Pacific, speaks during the Reuters Financial Regulation Summit in Hong Kong, China, May 19, 2016. REUTERS/Elzio Barreto

Hit by dwindling new listings and a growing number of Asian startups listing in the United States, both Singapore Exchange Ltd SGXL.SI and Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd 0388.HK have proposed new rules to allow companies to sell shares with different voting rights.

Introducing those changes may not help attract prospective initial public offering (IPO) candidates, mainly technology startups that choose New York, Pru Bennett told the Reuters Financial Regulation Summit.

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, was among several institutional investors opposing those changes in Hong Kong and Singapore as concerns grow that corporate governance in Asia Pacific would take a further hit.

“It’s the right thing for the exchanges to review what they’re doing to make sure they’re relevant and attracting the right companies and that they have some diversity amongst the listed companies on their boards,” Bennett said at her office in Hong Kong.

“We are not supporters of weighted voting rights or dual class shares. We think it potentially detracts from shareholder rights.”

The proposals come years after Chinese tech giants including Alibaba Group BABA.N and search company Baidu BIDU.O picked New York over Hong Kong, while more recently Singapore lost a $1 billion listing from homegrown e-commerce and digital payment firm Sea Ltd to the Big Apple.

“There are many reasons the companies, particularly Chinese internet companies, list in the U.S. Dual class shares, weighted voting rights is a component of that, but I’m not convinced that it’s the main reason,” Bennett said.

The number of public activist campaigns in Asia almost doubled in the first half of 2017 from levels seen in 2013 and 2014, with 38 companies facing calls from investors for greater transparency or fairer treatment to minority shareholders, according to research firm Activist Insight.

Despite that initial jump, the level of activity is forecast to decline to 65 for all of 2017 from the record 78 campaigns in 2016, it added.


Shareholder activism from investors such as U.S. hedge fund Elliott Management Corp and others would continue in coming years in Asia, Bennett said.

But a major surge was unlikely because several companies in local markets in the region were controlled by a small number of large shareholders, reducing the likelihood of success in activist campaigns, she added.

With 17 companies facing public campaigns, Japan took the lead among Asian countries, and it could remain a top market for activists.

“When you’ve got an incompetent board that’s a bit of a magnet for someone to come in and try to make changes because incompetent boards generally don’t make as good decisions as a competent board,” Bennett said about issues in Japan.

“It’s a bit like when you’re in Africa and you see the gazelles running and the slow one at the back gets eaten by the lion.”

Follow Reuters Summits on Twitter @Reuters_Summits

Reporting by Elzio Barreto and Sumeet Chatterjee; Editing by Stephen Coates