Ukraine presidential official counters Saakashvili's corruption claims

KIEV (Reuters) - The office of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko hit back on Thursday at claims by former regional governor Mikheil Saakashvili that Poroshenko had allowed corruption to flourish, saying Saakashvili had failed to deliver change while in office.

Former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili speaks during an interview with Reuters in Kiev, Ukraine, November 16, 2016. Picture taken November 16, 2016. REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko

Speaking to Reuters a week after resigning as a governor, Saakashvili, a former Georgian president who went on to have a second political career in Ukraine, had said Poroshenko either abetted or turned a blind eye to corruption.

In the first detailed rebuttal by a representative of Poroshenko since Saakashvili quit, Vitaliy Kovalchuk, the first deputy head of the Presidential Administration, told Reuters Saakashvili was a better politician than a manager.

Despite being given more power than any previous governor in Ukraine, and allowed to appoint his own people to key positions, Saakashvili had failed to bring corrupt people to book or deliver tangible reform in the customs service, Kovalchuk said.

“We may say that Mikheil Saakashvili did not manage to cope with his powers,” Kovalchuk told Reuters in an emailed statement.

“Believe me, no one in the presidential administration is happy about it. I regret that Mikheil Saakashvili turned out to be a far better politician than a manager.”

Saakashvili was appointed governor of the Odessa region in 2015 by Poroshenko - Kiev’s pro-Western leader who pledged to transform Ukraine after the Maidan street protests, partly fueled by anger over official corruption, led to the overthrow of the previous administration.

But for some in the country, dreams of radical change are fading; a report by Transparency International on Wednesday found nearly three-quarters of Ukrainians do not think there has been a reduction in corruption under Poroshenko, compared with under the former president, Kremlin-backed Viktor Yanukovich.

“Poroshenko wanted until now to appear nice in front of the West, that he is doing something, without really doing anything,” Saakashvili said. “Imitating change without really having any real substantial change.”

Reuters could not independently verify any of Saakashvili’s allegations.

Poroshenko and others in the government “have lost all taste for reforms”, Saakashvili said in an interview.

Slideshow ( 3 images )

“Real change and reform really means also decreasing the leverage for stealing, for plundering, pillaging Ukrainian wealth and for the cronies of the president and the others to basically increase their wealth,” he said.

“First they refused to help us when they could, and then they actually started to sabotage us.”

Kovalchuk countered assertions that Poroshenko didn’t help reforms in Odessa. As an example, he said Poroshenko initiated a law change allowing new roads to be built through the revenues collected from customs, with Odessa in mind.

But Odessa still lagged other regions in road repairs on Saakashvili’s watch, he said. He added Saakashvili had spent 47 percent, or 167 days out of the 357 days he was in charge of Odessa, traveling outside the region.

“Mikheil Saakashvili says that the president has lost the appetite for reforms, but in my opinion, Mikheil as the head of the region has failed to cook this meal,” he said.


When Saakashvili quit on Nov. 7 he said he planned to create a new Ukrainian political force without links to big business or established political factions, and that he would pressure the government for snap elections.

Saakashvili said he had hoped to reform Odessa on the Black Sea, which had a reputation as a hub for smuggling with a corrupt port customs service. But he said his efforts were blocked at every turn.

“We see some of the old cronies of Yanukovich, basically racketeer businesses, being replaced by people close to the sitting president,” Saakashvili said.

Recalling their conversations, Saakashvili said Poroshenko had tried to blame former Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk for blocking reform. But even after Yatseniuk’s government fell in April, Saakashvili said corruption was allowed to continue.

Yatseniuk resigned and, according to Saakashvili, the price he and his party exacted for supporting Poroshenko’s choice of new prime minister was the sacking a reformist prosecutor who was investigating a scam to loot fuel from a state-run refinery.

Yatseniuk’s People’s Front party did not respond to a request for comment.


Saakashvili also said the head of Odessa port customs, Yulia Marushevska, was prevented from implementing reforms to reduce the discretionary powers of officers to set the level of duties and recruit new people who would be less susceptible to bribes.

Saakashvili said Marushevska was hounded by official reprimands at the behest of another parliamentary faction leader in exchange for supporting Poroshenko’s coalition.

Marushevska, a Ukrainian, resigned on Monday, as did police chief Dekanoidze, a former Georgian government minister.

Marushevska was not immediately available to comment. She has previously accused vested interests in state agencies of sabotaging her attempts to fire corrupt officials.

Her superiors said her leadership had been unsatisfactory and that they had not seen any evidence of her reform plans.

Dekanoidze was also unavailable to comment. When she quit she said there was a conflict between “those who want to change, and those who are stuck in the past,” warning that politicians should stop meddling in the police force.

Earlier official departures in Ukraine included the Economy Minister, a Lithuanian who resigned in February accusing a Poroshenko ally of corruption.

“We were almost The Last of the Mohicans trying to keep faith in changing the system from within it,” Saakashvili said of reformists who had left their jobs. “So for us, giving up hope was very hard because we invested a lot of time, reputation, effort in trying to change the system.”

“Keeping the status quo would also destroy Ukraine, so we need some kind of positive change,” he said.

Additional reporting by Natalia Zinets in KIEV and Marja Novak in LJUBLJANA; editing by Pravin Char and Grant McCool