Romney seeks North American energy independence by 2020

HOBBS, New Mexico (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said on Thursday that if elected, he will ensure North American energy independence by 2020 by pursuing a sharp increase in production of oil and natural gas on federal lands and off the U.S. East Coast.

Romney unveiled his energy plan at a trucking company in New Mexico, seeking to draw a sharp contrast between his energy policies and those of President Barack Obama and explain how his approach would lead to job growth.

The U.S. economy can add 3 million jobs by tapping oil and gas reserves in the United States, Romney repeatedly said.

“This is not some pie-in-the-sky kind of thing,” he said. “This is a real, achievable objective.”

The emphasis on economic benefits was an effort to steer the campaign back to the issue Romney believes is crucial to his victory in the November 6 election.

The economic debate has been sidelined in recent days by controversial remarks about rape by a Senate Republican candidate in Missouri, Todd Akin, whom Romney has denounced.

Romney would open up areas off the East Coast to oil exploration, and in particular would reverse Obama’s decision to suspend development off the coast of Virginia following the 2010 BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

He would establish a five-year offshore leasing plan that would open new areas for development beginning with those off the coast of Virginia and the Carolinas.

A Romney administration also would seek a North American energy partnership with Canada and Mexico, and it would allow construction of the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to Texas, which has been delayed by the Obama administration.

Republican U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney campaigns at LeClaire Manufacturing in Bettendorf, Iowa, August 22, 2012. REUTERS/John Gress

The White House faulted Romney’s plan for relying too heavily on fossil fuels.

“I think what distinguishes the president’s approach ... from the Republican approach, is that the Republican approach is essentially one that is written by or dictated by big oil,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said.


But Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute think tank, which is cited in the Romney plan, said Romney was being realistic.

“The Romney plan reflects reality, and the reality is that most of the world’s energy comes from hydrocarbons and will for decades to come,” he said.

Even if Romney boosted domestic oil output, it would do little to protect Americans from high fuel prices because crude prices are set on global markets, said energy expert Michael Levi.

“U.S. economic vulnerability to volatile oil markets stems from the volume of oil we consume, not the volume we import,” said Levi, an energy and climate fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. “If you don’t change the volume of oil we consume, you’ve missed most of the problem.”

The centerpiece of Romney’s energy plan is to permit individual states to manage energy development on federal lands within their borders.

Currently the federal government controls development on these lands. Letting states issue permits for exploration on federal lands would speed up the process, Romney says.

The states’ decisions would continue to be reviewed and approved by the federal government under his plan.

Romney’s proposal also supports Washington’s ethanol quota, a mandate several U.S. governors want to suspend as the worst drought in over 50 years sends corn prices soaring to record levels. Corn is an important animal feed.

The mandate is aimed at encouraging the use of ethanol in car fuel.

The overall package makes little mention of climate change or greenhouse gases. Romney policy adviser Oren Cass said Romney supports green energy and government spending on energy research, but opposes loan guarantees for green companies.

The Republican candidate has assailed Obama’s investments in clean energy companies like the now bankrupt Solyndra.

A tax credit for the wind industry expires at the end of this year. Obama supports an extension of it while Romney opposes it even though it could hurt him with voters in Iowa and Colorado.

Additional reporting by Tim Gardner and Margaret Chadbourn in Washington, Joshua Schneyer in New York and Steve Holland; Editing by Xavier Briand