NEW YORK (Reuters) - Shares of a number of U.S. companies eyed in high-profile deals are trading significantly below their intended acquisition prices on worries that the deals will die, presenting an opportunity for some big-name investors.
The deal spreads span 10, 20 or 30 percent in some cases, against long-term averages in the low single digits, and funds such as T. Rowe Price and Franklin Mutual Advisers have made significant additions to target company shares, according to Thomson Reuters data.
It’s unclear whether the funds are seizing on an arbitrage opportunity or are scooping up shares for other reasons, such as seeing value in the target company regardless of whether the deals go through. The funds declined to comment.
But shareholders stand to profit handsomely in the event the deals win approval.
Investors may be more wary about deals closing after regulatory opposition scuttled several major mergers in recent months. Halliburton’s (HAL.N) combination with Baker Hughes BHI.N collapsed over antitrust concerns and Pfizer’s (PFE.N) purchase of pharmaceutical rival Allergan (AGN.N) fell apart in the wake of new tax rules.
Risks to the pending deals stem largely from antitrust concerns, particularly in healthcare industry, or because the buyers are Chinese companies, said investors.
“The market is pricing these risks properly in our view,” said John Orrico, chief investment officer of New York-based Water Island Capital, adviser to The Arbitrage Fund, which invests exclusively in merger deals. “There is a reason you should avoid the healthcare deals, there’s a reason you should avoid these Chinese-led buyer deals.”
The average spread of 15 big merger deals involving U.S. target companies is higher than usual now at about 9 percent, according to a Reuters analysis of pending deals above $5 billion. That is above the long term average for all merger spreads, estimated by Orrico at 3 to 5 percentage points above Treasury bill rates, which are currently around 0.2 percent.
The spreads are far wider for two pending mega-mergers involving U.S. health insurers. Anthem’s (ANTM.N) purchase of Cigna (CI.N) and Aetna’s (AET.N) acquisition of Humana (HUM.N) face significant antitrust concern as they involve combining four of the five biggest companies in that industry.
Cigna shares trade at a 35-percent discount to Anthem’s offer, which has an equity value of $44 billion, while Humana is currently about 21 percent below Aetna’s offer of about $34 billion.
The wide spreads indicate strong doubts that deals will close, adding some risk to owning the target company shares. Investors who buy now hoping to profit may find that a scuttled deal drags the stock down lower.
But the wider the spread, the closer the shares may be to their price without a merger premium. That could mean less of a fall should the deal collapse.
Take Cigna. At $126 a share, the stock is trading below where it was a year ago when news of the deal broke. That could soothe current investors, although the stock’s downside is unclear, given that Cigna shares had begun 2015 at $103 a share.
T. Rowe Price and MFS Investments made big additions to their Cigna holdings in the first quarter, according to Thomson Reuters data, during which time the spread for the cash-and-stock Anthem offer averaged 25 percent. Both funds declined to comment.
“If the deal is successfully completed, (institutional holders) will make the arbitrage spread and come out long the acquiring company,” said Roy Behren, portfolio manager of Westchester Capital Management’s The Merger Fund in Valhalla, New York. “And if the deal is blocked, they may lose a little bit in the short run, but they would believe that they would make money as the stock realizes its intrinsic value.”
Franklin Mutual Advisers, the third-largest Rite Aid shareholder, added virtually its whole position of nearly 30 million shares during the first quarter, according to Thomson Reuters data.
Franklin’s specific funds that added Rite Aid shares are known for investing in merger arbitrage opportunities, according to Morningstar. Franklin declined to comment.
Several deals with Chinese acquirers have encountered snafus, prompting fears about similar acquisitions. Ingram Micro IM.N is trading about 12 percent below a $6 billion bid from Chinese conglomerate HNA Group’s unit Tianjin Tianhai Investment Co Ltd (600751.SS), amid questions about securing U.S. government approvals.
Outside of the United States, Swiss pesticides maker Syngenta SYNN.S is trading at around an 18-percent discount to an offer from state-owned ChemChina. The deadline for shareholders to accept the deal was recently pushed back to allow for regulatory approvals.
Another recent acquisition bid in the agricultural sector may present an opportunity.
U.S. seed company Monsanto (MON.N) last month turned down a $122-per-share offer from Germany’s Bayer (BAYGn.DE), but sources have told Reuters that Monsanto has left the door open to a possible deal.
Nonetheless, Monsanto shares are trading at $107, 14 percent below the initial offer.
Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf and Rodrigo Campos; editing by Linda Stern and Nick Zieminski