* Obama called some Democrats about Keystone vote
* Republican Keystone plan unlikely to clear 60-vote hurdle
* Democratic alternative would block exports from Keystone
By Roberta Rampton and Jeff Mason
WASHINGTON, March 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate could vote as early as Thursday on a plan to fast-track the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline, a bid that is unlikely to attract enough Democratic support to pass but will give its Republican supporters an opening to criticize President Barack Obama’s energy policies.
Obama put the $7 billion project on hold pending further environmental review. Republicans argue the pipeline, which would ship oil from Canada and northern U.S. states to Texas, would create jobs and improve energy security at a time of surging gasoline prices.
The Republicans’ Keystone amendment to a highway funding bill would need 60 votes to pass, meaning at least 13 Democrats would have to vote in favor of the measure for it to advance.
Some Democratic senators have spoken in support of TransCanada’s pipeline in the past. Obama has called some Democratic senators to ensure they would vote against the Republican plan, a White House official said.
Republicans have sought to make Keystone an issue in the November presidential election, linking Obama’s delay to rising gasoline prices.
“At a moment when millions are out of work, gas prices are sky rocketing and the Middle East is in turmoil, we’ve got a president who’s up making phone calls trying to block a pipeline here at home. It’s unbelievable,” said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell.
Obama has supported construction of the southern leg of the pipeline, and his administration will assess a new route through an environmentally sensitive area of Nebraska once it has been identified, White House spokesman Clark Stevens said.
“Once again, Republicans are trying to play politics with a pipeline project whose route has yet to be proposed,” Stevens said.
The Republican amendment is among 30 measures - many of them energy related - that will get votes in coming days as the Senate pushes to renew funding for highways and other infrastructure projects, slated to run out at the end of March.
The pipeline would carry crude from Canadian oil sands to Texas refineries and would also pick up U.S. crude from North Dakota and Montana along the way.
Senators will also vote on a proposal from Democratic Senator Ron Wyden that would block exports of oil from the pipeline, as well as refined products made from the oil.
Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota, who has championed the Republican plan to advance the pipeline, said the Democratic alternative would be too restrictive and add costs to the project.
“Some refined products can’t be used in our country,” Hoeven said in a statement. “If these products can’t be exported, that revenue will be lost, and will force refiners to sell gas at a higher price.”
Wyden said his amendment “puts teeth” into claims the pipeline would boost U.S. energy supplies.
“You see all over television, commercials and enormous sums of money spent by the advocates who constantly keep talking about how this is going to strengthen domestic energy security,” Wyden said. “This amendment guarantees that.”
Wyden’s Keystone amendment will give Democratic senators a plan to vote for to show they are also concerned about rising gasoline prices, said Whitney Stanco, an energy policy analyst with Guggenheim Securities.
“By offering an alternative, Democrats are hoping to prevent either measure from reaching the 60-vote threshold,” Stanco said in an e-mail to clients.