Alibaba fails to curb excess in shopping fest

2 minute read

Delivery workers sort parcels at a makeshift logistics station near the Central Business District (CBD) during Singles’ Day shopping festival in Beijing, China November 11, 2021. REUTERS/Tingshu Wang

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

HONG KONG, Nov 12 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Toning down the world's largest spectacle of consumption to avoid a clash with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s common prosperity drive and environmental goals was never going to be an easy feat.

For the $456 billion Alibaba (9988.HK), the 11-day shopping fest held this month was an awkward mix of flogging $84.5 billion worth of discounted iPhones, lipsticks and more, while playing up the company's environmental and social responsibilities. Instead of broadcasting to the world a real-time tally of shopping transactions, for instance, the company opted for a live-streamed fundraising for an elephant reserve, Reuters reported read more . Still, the splurge looked conspicuous against China's supply chain disruptions, electricity shortages, fresh virus outbreaks and broader macroeconomic woes.

Alibaba's efforts failed to strike the right balance. Just a day after the festival ended, an opinion published by Chinese state media blasted read more it as a "worship of turnover" that stimulated "low-level" consumption incompatible with the country's development. As each year passes, the festival may be less important to the company’s bottom line. Calling it off read more completely is the best thing to do. (By Robyn Mak)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

On Twitter

Capital Calls - More concise insights on global finance:

Tesla money train enriches more than just CEO read more

Daimler starts engine on truck M&A monster mashup read more

Engie finds a measured form of green pivot read more

Johnson Matthey quits while it’s behind read more

Burberry’s next CEO job gets even harder read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to
Editing by

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.