Bankers get red faces in German landlord M&A fail

The logo of German real estate company Vonovia is seen at a Vonovia building in Essen
The logo of German real estate company Vonovia SE, a member of the German DAX-30 stock market index is seen at a Vonovia building in Essen, western Germany May 10, 2016.

LONDON, July 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Here’s one for the M&A connoisseurs: German landlord Vonovia’s (VNAn.DE) 18 billion euro offer for Deutsche Wohnen (DWNG.DE) has probably failed, even though the target’s investors wanted it to succeed. Preliminary tender results released late on Friday showed that around 48% of shareholders accepted, just shy of a minimum 50% threshold.

It’s not that investors refused a lowball bid: Deutsche’s shares never traded more than a fraction above the 52-euros-per-share offer read more . Instead, the problem seems to be a communication breakdown between hedge funds which own one-third of Deutsche Wohnen’s equity and Vonovia, which was advised by Bank of America (BAC.N), Société Générale (SOGN.PA), Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Perella Weinberg.

The hedge funds stood to gain if Vonovia landed somewhere between 50% and 100%: courtesy of German takeover laws they could eventually demand more money if Vonovia sought full control. But no one had a reason to tender more shares than were necessary to get it over the line. Bankers and shareholder-advisory groups usually coordinate the process if the vote looks close, according to two people involved in the deal. Somehow, that message seems to have been lost. (By Liam Proud)

On Twitter http://twitter.com/breakingviews

Capital Calls - More concise insights on global finance:

Hard seltzer boom goes flat read more

Hitting tech on Covid lies is a healthy compromise read more

Commerzbank outsourcing flop is warning for rivals read more

Zomato’s IPO dish arrives dangerously hot read more

Lucid Motors’ SPAC deal hits loopy roadblock read more

Editing by Peter Thal Larsen and Karen Kwok

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.