Pandora Papers vs. Facebook Files

The loading screen of the Facebook application on a mobile phone is seen in this photo illustration taken in Lavigny May 16, 2012. REUTERS/Valentin Flauraud/File Photo

NEW YORK, Oct 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) - It’s no surprise that presidents, prime ministers and one king have used secretive offshore financial arrangements. Jordan’s King Abdullah and Czech Republic Prime Minster Andrej Babis are among those mentioned in the massive Pandora Papers document leak to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. As with the recent exposé by the Wall Street Journal contrasting Facebook’s (FB.O) public statements and inner workings, though, it helps to bolster perceptions with facts.

Activities involving disclosure-shy regimes from the Seychelles to South Dakota, as disclosed in the Pandora Papers, aren’t illegal in themselves. Nor is their facilitation by intermediaries such as Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Baker & McKenzie. They can, however, be used to hide wealth, including from tax collectors. Many of those named deny wrongdoing read more . If there is any, though, the 3 terabytes of data scoured by the ICIJ should help find it.

That’s also what the Facebook data drop might achieve. The social network knows its platform can cause harm. It says it tries to mitigate negative effects. But business goals and a rosy self-image get in the way. Detailed documentation can cut through the spin on all sides. The test – of either leak – will be whether it brings improvements. (By Richard Beales)

On Twitter http://twitter.com/breakingviews

Capital Calls - More concise insights on global finance:

Geely’s Volvo IPO should go better this time read more

U.S. cable giant could spoil BT’s fibre party read more

ESG drills deeper into Gulf oil IPOs read more

Zoom’s doomed deal may have exposed a weakness read more

Merck’s $15 bln gain is stingy read more

Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Amanda Gomez

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.