Retail & Consumer

Cannabis producer Tilray wins dismissal of shareholder lawsuit in New York

2 minute read

Cannabis plants grow inside the Tilray factory hothouse in Cantanhede, Portugal April 24, 2019. REUTERS/Rafael Marchante/File Photo

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

NEW YORK, Sept 27 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Monday dismissed a lawsuit accusing Tilray Inc (TLRY.TO), , the world's largest cannabis producer by sales, of fraudulently overstating the value of a marketing and revenue-sharing agreement with Authentic Brands Group Inc (AUTH.N).

U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty in Manhattan said shareholders failed to show that the Canadian company exhibited "conscious misbehavior or recklessness" in trumpeting the agreement, when it knew that regulatory uncertainty over cannabis-based products would dampen customer demand.

"Tilray certainly appears to have overestimated, by orders of magnitude, both the value of the ABG Agreement and the likelihood of fortuitous regulatory change," Crotty wrote. "But being wrong - even embarrassingly so - is not the same as being dishonest."

Register now for FREE unlimited access to

Crotty also said shareholders failed to show that former Chief Executive Brendan Kennedy intended to defraud them by arranging a "downstream merger" in Dec 2019 between Tilray and his Privateer Holdings Inc to ensure Privateer maintained voting control over Tilray and could reap tax benefits.

The judge said the shareholders could file a new complaint to try to address shortcomings in their case.

Lawyers for the shareholders did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Tilray and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Shareholders sued after Tilray on March 2, 2020 wrote down the value of the ABG agreement by about 86%, or $102.6 million, citing regulatory uncertainty, and reported lower inventory and margins than they expected.

Tilray's share price fell 15% the next day, and went on to fall 84% in half a month, coinciding with the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Crotty ruled nearly four months after a Delaware state judge said investors could sue over the downstream merger and pursue a "fairness review" because the transaction offered "unique" tax benefits to Privateer's founders.

The case is Kassin et al v Tilray Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-03459.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Stephen Coates

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

More from Reuters