Welcome to Reuters Legal News beta. Please enjoy and provide us with your feedback as we continue to improve the Reuters Legal News experience.

Skip to main content
Skip to floating mini video

Book publishers say Internet Archive 'stonewalling' discovery

2 minute read


Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com
  • Group of publishers sued nonprofit digital archive in 2020 claiming "willful mass copyright infringement"
  • Publishers' attorney now says Internet Archive withholding key documents

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) - A group of major book publishers accused the nonprofit Internet Archive on Friday of trying to "run out the clock" on the discovery process in their Manhattan federal court dispute over the digital archive's alleged copyright infringement.

An attorney for Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, John Wiley & Sons Inc and Penguin Random House said in a letter that the Archive has been "stonewalling" by refusing to produce key documents.

The Internet Archive's attorney Joseph Gratz of Durie Tangri said in an email that it already provided some of the documents and is "working diligently to collect and provide" the others.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Gratz noted the court has already set a hearing on its own request to compel the publishers to turn over evidence.

The discovery period ends Dec. 17.

The publishers sued the San Francisco-based Internet Archive last year over its free online lending of digitized books during COVID-19 lockdowns, a move they called a scheme for "willful mass copyright infringement."

The Archive responded that it "does what libraries have always done: buy, collect, preserve, and share our common culture," and is protected by the fair use doctrine.

The Friday letter, signed by the publishers' attorney Scott Zebrak of Oppenheim + Zebrak, said the evidence the Archive produced during discovery lacked important documents such as lending procedures and policies.

The publishers' attorneys, Zebrak and Elizabeth McNamara of Davis Wright Tremaine didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

The case is Hachette Book Group Inc v. Internet Archive, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 1:20-cv-04160.

For the publishers: Elizabeth McNamara of Davis Wright Tremaine, Scott Zebrak of Oppenheim + Zebrak

For the Internet Archive: Joseph Gratz of Durie Tangri, Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Read more:

Book publishers sue over 'emergency' online library set up during pandemic

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Reach him at blake.brittain@thomsonreuters.com

More from Reuters