Welcome to Reuters Legal News beta. Please enjoy and provide us with your feedback as we continue to improve the Reuters Legal News experience.

Skip to main content
Skip to floating mini video

Apple hit with $300 million patent verdict after new Optis trial

2 minute read

The Apple logo at an Apple Store in Brooklyn, New York, U.S. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
  • Lowers previous jury award of $506 million for infringing LTE patents
  • New trial ordered in April

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

(Reuters) - Apple Inc owes a $300 million lump sum for infringing wireless standard-essential patents owned by IP management company Optis Wireless Technology and its affiliates, a federal jury in an East Texas federal court said Friday after a four-day trial.

A jury ruled last year in the same case that Apple owed $506 million for infringing Plano, Texas-based Optis, PanOptis Patent Management, and Unwired Planet's LTE patents with technology found in its iPhone and other LTE-capable products. U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap ordered a new trial in his Marshall, Texas, court in April, after finding the award may not have been in line with Optis' responsibility to license the patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

"We thank the jury for their time but are disappointed by the verdict and plan to appeal," Apple spokesperson Josh Rosenstock said in an email. "Optis makes no products and its sole business is to sue companies using patents they accumulate. We will continue to defend against their attempts to extract unreasonable payments."

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Apple's attorney Mark Selwyn of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr didn't immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did Optis and its attorneys Jason Sheasby and Annita Zhong of Irell & Manella.

The case is Optis Wireless Technology LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, No. 2:19-cv-00066.

For Apple: Mark Selwyn of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, Melissa Smith of Gillam Smith

For Optis: Jason Sheasby and Annita Zhong of Irell & Manella, Sam Baxter of McKool Smith, Jill Bindler of Gray Reed & McGraw

Read more:

IN BRIEF: Apple socked with $506 million patent verdict in East Texas

Apple wins new damages trial in $506 million patent loss

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Washington-based correspondent covering court cases, trends, and other developments in intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Previous experience at Bloomberg Law, Thomson Reuters Practical Law and work as an attorney.

More from Reuters