Welcome to Reuters Legal News beta. Please enjoy and provide us with your feedback as we continue to improve the Reuters Legal News experience.

Skip to main content

Locast agrees to pay $32 million to resolve dispute with major TV networks

3 minute read

REUTERS/Gleb Garanich

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com
  • Networks accused over-the-air streamer of violating copyrights
  • Locast halted operations last month after losing key defense
  • Locast agrees to pay damages, permanently end service

(Reuters) - The operator of over-the-air streaming service Locast has agreed to pay $32 million and end its operations for good to resolve claims that it infringes the four major television networks' copyrights, according to a Thursday filing in Manhattan federal court.

Locast halted its service last month following its loss on a key defense to the networks' lawsuit in August. U.S. District Judge Louis Stanton ordered the network to permanently stop operating shortly after.

Locast captured signals from local broadcast stations and retransmitted them over the internet to give Americans access to free television they couldn't otherwise watch for technical, geographic, or other reasons.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Attorney David Goodfriend, who previously worked for the Clinton Administration, U.S. Federal Communications Commission, and DISH Network and is currently of counsel at Weiner Brodsky Kider, founded the nonprofit that owns Locast. The networks sued Goodfriend and the nonprofit, Sports Fans Coalition NY, in 2019.

Goodfriend didn't immediately respond to a request for comment; neither did his and Locast's lawyers David Hosp of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Michael Dockterman of Steptoe & Johnson, or Mitchell Stoltz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The networks and their attorney Gerson Zweifach of Williams & Connolly also didn't immediately respond to a request for comment; neither did Paul Clement of Kirkland & Ellis, who represents Fox Television Stations LLC and related entities separately.

Locast had argued it was immune from the claims based on part of the Copyright Act that allows nonprofits to retransmit media if they don't charge more than it costs to operate their service, in an attempt to distinguish it from Aereo, a similar for-profit streaming service that the U.S. Supreme Court found violated copyright law in 2014.

Stanton said Locast's defense failed because it charged more than necessary to cover its costs, receiving $4.3 million from user payments last year compared to $2.4 million in costs. He noted that Locast provided free streams, but interrupted non-paying users every 15 minutes to request donations, which users could avoid by paying for "preferred" access.

Stanton said Locast's "donations" were "really a scale of fees for uninterrupted service."

The case is American Broadcasting Companies Inc v. Goodfriend, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:19-cv-07136.

For the networks: Gerson Zweifach of Williams & Connolly

For Fox: Paul Clement of Kirkland & Ellis

For Locast: David Hosp of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Michael Dockterman of Steptoe & Johnson; Mitchell Stoltz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Read more:

Big broadcasters sue non-profit that streams TV channels for free

Locast loses key defense against major networks' copyright claims

TV streamer Locast halts operations after losing key ruling in fight with networks

Big broadcasters vanquish upstart Aereo at U.S. Supreme Court

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Blake Brittain reports on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Reach him at blake.brittain@thomsonreuters.com

More from Reuters