European Markets

ExxonMobil's governance structure fails the energy transition -Engine No. 1

3 minute read
1/2

The logo of Exxon Mobil Corporation is shown on a monitor above the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, December 30, 2015. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said on April 26, 2016, it had cut Exxon Mobil Corp's corporate credit rating to "AA+" from "AAA," citing the impact of low oil prices. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
  • ExxonMobil invested in projects it shouldn't have - Engine No. 1
  • ExxonMobil said it sees growth potential in low carbon area

LONDON, Dec 2 (Reuters) - A failing governance structure propagated by a management without a strategy for the energy transition was behind Engine No. 1's quest to bring independence to ExxonMobil's board, Chris James, founder of the U.S. hedge fund told Reuters.

Governments, companies and individuals are taking steps to cut their carbon footprints and enable the energy transition which includes electric vehicles and renewable energy such as wind turbines and solar.

ExxonMobil (XOM.N) has been an outlier in transparency and accountability in its environmental impact, James said in an interview at the Reuters Next Conference.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

"This is a company that has lost its social licence ... It needs to look at the energy transition as an opportunity to be part of the solution instead of the problem."

Three of four people with energy transition experience nominated by Engine No. 1 joined ExxonMobil's board earlier this year.

Oil majors such as BP (BP.L) facing mounting pressure from regulators and investors have moved to develop cleaner energy and divest from fossil fuels, a primary source of greenhouse-gas emissions that cause global warming. read more

ExxonMobil has instead invested in new projects in the oil and gas arena that should not have been approved and wasted capital, James said, adding that the company had some of the most talented engineers in the world.

"Management has prevented these engineers from unleashing the power they have to create value in the energy transition," James said, adding that ExxonMobil had outperformed Chevron since Engine No. 1's intervention.

ExxonMobil's shares are up around 60% since November 2020 when Engine No. 1 bought them compared with roughly 30% for Chevron (CVX.N).

In response to a request for comment ExxonMobil said: "We evaluate our investments across a range of scenarios – including net-zero pathways – and we look forward to sharing more details in the coming months."

"There is significant growth potential in the low-carbon opportunities where we can leverage our competencies in technology, engineering, and project development," Exxon's emailed response said. "This gives ExxonMobil an advantaged position irrespective of the pace of the energy transition."

PLUG-IN HYBRIDS

Linking sustainability with profitability is a theme that runs through Engine No. 1's portfolio, James said, which is why the hedge fund took a stake in General Motors (GM.N), where the board is fully behind management's plans. read more

Battery powered electric vehicles, create an opportunity for General Motors to win an enormous share of the market this decade, James said.

"Japanese automakers have made a bet that plug-in hybrid electric vehicles are the future, not battery electric vehicles, and we believe that is a mistake by the Japanese automakers and an opportunity for GM and Ford (F.N)," he said.

"During my lifetime, GM haven't had the opportunity to gain as much share as they will have in the next 10 years."

To watch the Reuters  Next conference please register at https://reutersevents.com/events/next/

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
Reporting by Pratima Desai; Editing by David Evans

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

More from Reuters